PotentialFOAM - meeting the Kutta condition

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

January 9, 2012, 05:32
PotentialFOAM - meeting the Kutta condition
#1
New Member

Richard Moser
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9
I am using the potentialFOAM solver for flow around a 2D aerofoil (in this case a multi-element aerofoil, but my question is general). I understand the limitations of using a potential solver, but there are good reasons for doing it in this case. The problem I am having is in making sure that the Kutta condition is satisfied. I have attached a screenshot of the streamlines I am currently getting, which indicate that the Kutta condition is not being satisfied (and also explains why my results match neither the exact solution or the output from another potential method). My question is therefore what I need to do to make sure that the Kutta condition is satisfied - is it something in my boundary files (which I have attached), or a separate setting somewhere?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Richard
Attached Images
 streamlines.jpg (67.0 KB, 44 views)
Attached Files
 initialConditions.txt (975 Bytes, 14 views) U.txt (1.3 KB, 14 views) p.txt (1.3 KB, 7 views)

 January 11, 2012, 15:29 #2 Senior Member   Pablo Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 102 Rep Power: 9 To get kutta condition you need a rotational fluid, so at least inviscid. With potential flow you need to define the wakes explicitly.

 January 11, 2012, 16:43 #3 New Member   Richard Moser Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 24 Rep Power: 9 Thanks for your response. Do you know how to define the wake explicitly in potentialFoam?

 January 11, 2012, 17:42 #4 Senior Member   Pablo Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 102 Rep Power: 9 well, a very rude solution would be create a gap at the mesh from the trailing edge until the end, you must choose the angle (it could be aligned with free stream or tangent to trailing edge and after aligned with T.E.) And the best solution is work with euler equations, it means delete every difusive term, u will work with inviscid rotational fluid.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Nick R CFX 5 April 19, 2011 23:37 kaan Main CFD Forum 2 September 29, 2009 04:57 snegan Main CFD Forum 3 January 6, 2006 11:45 Afungchui Main CFD Forum 5 January 28, 2005 07:02 saba Main CFD Forum 3 July 17, 2003 09:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top