# GGI Dynamic RPM: Speed question

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 22, 2012, 13:21 GGI Dynamic RPM: Speed question #1 Senior Member   Robert Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 154 Rep Power: 6 I am preparing a case where OpenFOAM is called from a script to run one iteration at a time. This is to extract forces and moments each timestep to calculate a new RPM and rewriting dynamicMeshDict. Can someone elaborate on the runtime of this program, stopping and starting OpenFOAM every iteration? How much slower would it be than if I could better integrate the RPM change in the OpenFOAM software?

 March 23, 2012, 08:39 #2 New Member   Gabriele Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 6 Rep Power: 5 Actually I'm interested in this problem too. In the simple case of a turbine rotating around a fixed axis, I ask if it is possible to use a ODE solver for the equation I \dot{\omega} = M where \omega is the angular velocity (of the turbine, hence of the GGI), I is the fixed moment of inertia and M is the torque (referred to the rotation axis) that comes from "forces" library. The angular velocity in the dynamicMeshDict should be "linked" to the above equation. I'm new in OF, so I don't know if it is correct and possible. Regards

 March 23, 2012, 12:32 #3 Senior Member   Robert Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 154 Rep Power: 6 Its definitely possible. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjr7NUe5hfg I was just going to use a form of what you had stated: (torque) = (rotational inertia) * (angular acceleration) take (angular acceleration) = (change in angular velocity) / (time step) then (change in angular velocity) = (time step) * (torque from forces output) / (rotational inertia)

 March 23, 2012, 16:37 #4 New Member   Gabriele Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 6 Rep Power: 5 Thanks. I think this is the point: > (change in angular velocity) = (time step) * (torque from forces output) / (rotational inertia) Can I get a reliable result applying only this rough formula? Which is the "right" time step? I was thinking about applying also some ODE solver to get a better control of the time step, but I don't know if it is necessary. Regards

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Kosum FLUENT 3 December 25, 2008 11:00 JXIA Main CFD Forum 4 January 10, 2008 04:50 zhhwoo FLUENT 0 August 2, 2006 22:36 dragon Main CFD Forum 1 April 28, 2005 15:11 Tango FLUENT 1 November 27, 2003 03:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:37.