CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

sprayFoam results depend on the type of chemistryReader (chemkinReader/foamChemistry

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 26, 2012, 21:03
Exclamation sprayFoam results depend on the type of chemistryReader (chemkinReader/foamChemistry
  #1
New Member
 
arash
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
arash1 is on a distinguished road
Dear Everyone,

I ran sprayFoam solver for a case similar to aachenBomb. In the case, chemkinReader is selected by default as the type of chemistry reader and its necessary files including chem.inp and therm.dat are specified in thermophysicalProperties located in constant directory.

The problem is that when I changed the type of chemistry reader to foamChemistryReader and added the corresponding reaction and thermo.compressibleGas files, the results of simulation turned out to be different. It seems the evaporation rate is lower when using foamChemistryReader instead of chemkinReader leading to further penetration length of spray tip.

For the species in thermo.compressibleGas, I set the same values as those in ~OpenFOAM/thermoData/therm.dat (see the attachment). So, I wonder what is the cause of such a difference.

Any help is appreciated.


Screenshot-chemkinReader.jpg

Screenshot-foamChemistryReader.jpg

thermophysicalProperties.zip
arash1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2012, 13:47
Default
  #2
New Member
 
arash
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
arash1 is on a distinguished road
I'm still interested in getting an answer.

I have attached two spray cases that are similar in all the input parameters but not in the type of chemistry reader. The cases are simple so that the run time of sprayFoam will be less than 5 minutes.

Although values in thermo.compressibleGas are same as those in chemkin (note that As and Ts values are hard-coded for chemkin reader as it is mentioned by Niklas Nordin), the results of simulation in my machine are significantly different. I'm using an updated git version of Open FOAM 2.1.x on Ubuntu 11.04.

Is this a bug or have I set something wrong?

Any help from experts is highly appreciated.
Attached Files
File Type: zip aachenBomb2.zip (31.3 KB, 25 views)

Last edited by arash1; April 2, 2012 at 14:02.
arash1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
chemistryreader, sprayfoam

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem: Very long "write" time (~2h-3h) for results and transient results Shawn_A CFX 14 March 11, 2014 10:38
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 Rajeev Kumar Singh FLUENT 6 December 19, 2010 12:33
help: results depend on writeInterval ckoch OpenFOAM 2 September 1, 2010 19:42
compile errors of boundary condition "expDirectionMixed" liying02ts OpenFOAM Bugs 2 February 1, 2010 21:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:49.