|October 24, 2012, 09:47||
Numerics in OpenFoam - PBiCG vs. PCG
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 8Rep Power: 6
to give an accurate validation for some channelFlow-case, my Prof wants me to estimate how good the numeric methods are, that i'm using in OpenFoam.
But honestly not having much Background in numerical-Math but a bit in physics, it's hard for me to grasp even the concept of the piso solver.
Using Gauss linear-Approximation everywhere for spacial discretisation shemes and using Chrank Nicholson shemes for time discretisation, I think this Methods are used to solve the euqations of the piso-loop - what i don't know where does PCG and PBiCG come into play - as i found there are in use for every Field U p... and
if i use Chrank Nicholoson 0.5 which is implicit - what kind of sheme is used therefore - more or less every field should be involved in this linear system?
Is it that for every gradient divergence and so on... a PCG or PBicG method will be used?
Sorry if this question are not precise, but this might be cause i don't understand everything completely, if you could give recommand some liturature it would be nice.
|October 24, 2012, 14:27||
Meindert de Groot
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 34Rep Power: 5
The PCG method and PBicG method will give a different solution to the system of equations, say
Given a certain tolerance , each method will give a solution that satisfies
for some norm . So .
If you would like to read a bit about these iterative methods, I would recommend reading 'Principles of computational fluid dynamics' by P. Wesseling. I should warn you, the book is written from a mathematical point of view. It might be quite challenging to read.
However, my guess is that your professor wants you to look at different numerical schemes, each giving a different system of equations.
|October 25, 2012, 06:19||
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 44Rep Power: 7
Meindert already mentioned, the difference between a PCG or a PBiCG,...
you can find in any textbook about linear iterative solvers like
Wessling, Saad, Trefethen, Stran,.... I think the book from Saad you find free on the www.
But I think your problems are a bit different.
Sine OF is a segregated solver, for every field (variable) there has to be solved a
linear system (i.e. for U, p,...) you have AU=b, Bp=c, A;B matrices.
Your choice of the numerical schemes
(entries for the operator discretization in fvSchemes, i.e.
(linear, upwind, limitedLinear,...)
for the operators is respobsible of the coefficients of this matrices.
So the choice of operators regarding f.i. U are responsible for the
properties/coefficients of the matrix A
The choice of your solution/solving algorithm (i.e. entries in fvSolution)
is responsible which iterative solver is used to solve your linear system.
So choosing f.i. PCG for U and PBiCG for p,
AU=b is solved iteratively bc PCG, Bp=c with PBiCG
and so forth.
Being also a mathematician, as a book enlighting CFD and numerics, I would also recommend Ferziger/Peric: Computational methods for fluid dynamics
|numerics pcg pbicg|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Floating point exception error||Alan||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||10||April 6, 2012 14:02|
|2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH||aeroslacker||Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...||12||January 19, 2012 04:52|
|OpenFOAM 1.6.x, 1.7.0 and 1.7.x are not fully prepared to work with gcc-4.5.x||wyldckat||OpenFOAM Bugs||18||October 21, 2010 05:51|
|Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64||wyldckat||OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources||3||September 8, 2010 06:25|
|The OpenFOAM extensions project||mbeaudoin||OpenFOAM||16||October 9, 2007 09:33|