CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Verification & Validation

Valildation of OF for external aerodinamics

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2012, 04:25
Default Valildation of OF for external aerodinamics
  #1
New Member
 
andrea ciarella
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
andrea.ciarella is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have one problem with OF. I am trying to validate SimpleFOAM for external aerodynamics.

The problem is

Airfoil: s822
Mach: 0.1
Reynolds: 500000

I am generating the polar from the angle of attack -10 to 14 with steps of 1 degree.

I compared the results with Experimental data and another code.


I used Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model with y+ = 1 and tested several numerical schemes. I only attached the best results


lift-drag.jpg

Polar.jpg

pressure.jpg

my questions are:

The drag is wrong after the linear range, the cause is a wrong stagnation pressure. Is here any way to improve it?

If I want to use a wall fuction which one do you think I have to use?

Do you think will be better with other solvers or turbulences? I test K-Omega sst but the results are similar.

Does a validation of OpenFOAM for external aerodynamics exist?

Thank you in advance
Andrea
andrea.ciarella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2012, 13:52
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 8
sail is on a distinguished road
Hi there.

could if be possible to see your mesh? my suspect is that you don't have enough spatial resolution in the chord direction and not enough layers in the boundary layer. I got excellent results with 100-150 points for in the chord and at lest 20 cells across the BL

also, it the error can be due to the turbulence model. SA is mostly effective for high Mach numbers, say 0.6+

at your Re lot of drag is due to friction more than pressure, so i would reccomand a model that can show laminar-turbulent transition like the k-o SST gamma-re-theta.

there is an excelent implementation for openfoam in the forum. try to google it.
__________________
http://www.leadingedge.it/
Naval architecture and CFD consultancy
sail is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2012, 14:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
calim_cfd's Avatar
 
mauricio
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 8
calim_cfd is on a distinguished road
hi!

just to emphasize.. a pic of your mesh would be helpfull.

try plotting the y+(y*) values for each aoa too along the wing span.

also, make sure ur boundary conditions match the experimental one.

other than that i dont c where the problem could be

gl
__________________
Best Regards
/calim

"Elune will grant us the strength"
calim_cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2012, 03:51
Default Mesh
  #4
New Member
 
andrea ciarella
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
andrea.ciarella is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your replay.

The mesh is a semistructured mesh

mesh.jpg

I used different mesh with y+ between 0.1 an 3 to see if it is an effect of the mesh, but I didn't get much difference

I will try the transition model next week and I will post the results.

From my point of view the biggest problem is the wrong stagnation pressure that is the cause of he wrong drag.

I already tested other farfield boundary conditions, but doesn't change the solution.

Did somebody have/know some proper validation of the solver for external aero?

Thank you


Regards
Andrea Ciarella
andrea.ciarella is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2012, 12:28
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
calim_cfd's Avatar
 
mauricio
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 8
calim_cfd is on a distinguished road
hi again!

im not an expert in lift/drag calculations but are you updating the reference area with the aoa? do ppl usually do that when plotting those charts?
__________________
Best Regards
/calim

"Elune will grant us the strength"
calim_cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
external aerdynamics, simplefoam, stagnation pressure, validation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01.