CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Verification & Validation

RhoSimpleFoam - turbulent flow over a flat plate

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2014, 10:04
Default RhoSimpleFoam - turbulent flow over a flat plate
  #1
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 5
Delcraft is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I'am trying to train the application of k-epsilon turbulence model in OpenFOAM on a benchmark problem of turbulent incompressible flow over a flat plate. I used the following boundary conditions (they were taken from this link: http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/flatplate.html):
Inlet Velocity: 0.2 M (Re = 8.5E6)
Flat plate length: 2 m
Inlet total temperature: 302.4 K
Outlet and freestream pressure: 101325 Pa

I solved this problem on two computational meshes, with Y+ = 112 and 32. After the solution I plotted the dimensionless velocity profile in a boundary layer expecting to obtain the law of the wall resolution. But instead I obtained a strange distribution of the velocity for both of comp. meshes (you could find the plot attached). For both of solutions there was a linear velocity interpolation below of given Y+ values and something like logarithmic distribution above. But even for the latter if we project the "logarithmic line" down to Y+=1, we won't obtain the value of U+ = 5.1 (what we should obtain from the log-law).

Finally, I have a question - am I don't understand the work of wall functions in k-epsilon model (and wall functions in general) or these results are strange indeed? Because I think that the wall function must interpolate the velocity profile correspondingly to the law of the wall (and viscous and log. sublayers must present) if I place the first grid point correctly (in this case, into the logarithmic sublayer, Y+>= 30).
Thanks in advance,

Delcraft
Attached Images
File Type: png Uplus.png (5.5 KB, 20 views)
Delcraft is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2014, 08:07
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Paul
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 5
Delcraft is on a distinguished road
I suppose that I caught the sense of these approximations... The law-of-the-wall formula is used just for a calculation of dependent variables (like wall shear stress, K and epsilon) on the wall from known parameters like Y coordinate and Velocity, and it doesn't relates to interpolation between grid nodes.
So, this theme is closed now.
Delcraft is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
flat plate, k-epsilon model, openfoam 2.3.0

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flat plate analysis in cfx hamed.majeed CFX 14 February 4, 2015 08:07
Experimental Results for turbulent flow over a flat plate mb.pejvak Main CFD Forum 0 May 18, 2012 22:20
Flow Over a Flat Plate recon9 CFX 1 January 20, 2011 22:09
compressible laminar flow over flat plate varunjain89 Main CFD Forum 17 March 25, 2010 00:51
Turbulent Flat Plate Validation Case Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 0 April 2, 2004 10:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:50.