OpenFOAM stress analysis results are showing 8-10% error with analytical solution.
I am running solidDisplacementFoam problem for thermal stress analysis. My solution is converged but not showing good agreement with analytical solution.
Simulation results shows 8-10% error with analytical solution. Does 8-10% error is fine for solid problems?
Has anybody an idea?
I presume you are referring to the "hollow cylinder with internal temperature" case as described by Timoshenko, Theory of Elasticity.
I tried this case and I found that the errors become very small (much much less than 1%) as you refine the mesh.
I have attached an graph showing a comparison between the results from a coarse and fine mesh.
To answer your question about "is 8-10% error ok?", in general for solid mechanics, it depends on the assumptions made in the analytical solutions (and in the numerical model). But for relatively straight-forward linear elastic and thermal elastic, the results should be very close to the analytical, especially as the mesh is refined.
Hope it helps,
Thanks a lot for the reply. Actually here I am solving another problem of thermal stresses for OpenFOAM validation. This problem is given in Timoshenko (page no. 399). This is for a rectangular plate.
I am going to email this case to you.
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:46.|