|September 14, 2012, 04:55||
how many cells with RANS
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leoben (Austria)
Blog Entries: 5Rep Power: 21
I have a new question. I had a look at a few presentations on the 7th OFW and other stuff. I realized that the meshes they use with RANS are not fine at all. Alberto Cuoci (for an example) uses very small cell meshes with RANS modelling of his catalystic and flamelet solver. In work I see always big and fine meshes used with RANS and so I am a bit confused what is the best way.
I think there is no exact answer but most of the meshes that I see I think you can calculate all fluctuations couse of the fine mesh. In a case a student meshed a geometry of about (highxlenthxwidth) 20cm x 50 cm x 20 cm with round about 4.5 million cells.
Is there any litrature or something like that where I can find some informations. Couse I think that its not worth to build a mesh with 4.5 million cells if you get about the same resolution with 800.000 - 1.000.000 cells.
For any suggestions I ll be very thankful
|September 28, 2012, 09:08||
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 52Rep Power: 6
The correct way is to estimate you discretization error with a mesh refinement study.
(e.g.: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/val...spatconv.html; Roache grid refinement studies)
You do the same simulation on different meshes (coarse and fine) and compare the solution. Your grid is fine enough, when the difference to the result of a simultaion of a finer grid is less than your margin of error.
|September 28, 2012, 09:40||
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
Posts: 216Rep Power: 10
the number of cells in your mesh depend highly on what you are actually
Unfortunately I cannot comment on the case from Alberto you mentioned
since I don't do such type of calculations, but for ship hull evaluation
I use the following parameters:
- check the resolution of the boundary layer (y+value e.g. with
checkMesh) this value should be below 300
- resolution of the free surface: over the expected wave hight there
should be a layer of at least 12 cells
- in the area where you are expecting the waves the cells cross section
should be less than a square meter
- finally use a smooth transition from a dense grid to a coarse grid.
in the other areas you might use a coarser grid ( for me sometimes cells
with a volume of several cubic meters
(domain size 500 x 200 x 55 [m x m x m])) and the total number of cells
is sometimes up to 6M cells when using a very dense mesh, but usually
much less (approx. a third of it).
So this is how I end up with my number of cells. But I guess for other
problems the required resolution might be different.
I hope I could contribute
PS: Grüße ins Ländle meine alte Heimat!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|No layers in a small gap||bobburnquist||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||6||August 26, 2015 09:38|
|Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM||hsieh||Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...||32||September 13, 2011 05:50|
|snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere!||sc298||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||2||March 27, 2011 21:11|
|snappyHexMesh aborting||Tobi||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||0||November 10, 2010 04:23|
|physical boundary error!!||kris||CD-adapco||2||August 3, 2005 00:32|