CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

how many cells with RANS

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By blacksquirrel

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 14, 2012, 04:55
Default how many cells with RANS
Senior Member
Tobi's Avatar
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leoben (Austria)
Posts: 1,125
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 20
Tobi will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Hello all,

I have a new question. I had a look at a few presentations on the 7th OFW and other stuff. I realized that the meshes they use with RANS are not fine at all. Alberto Cuoci (for an example) uses very small cell meshes with RANS modelling of his catalystic and flamelet solver. In work I see always big and fine meshes used with RANS and so I am a bit confused what is the best way.

I think there is no exact answer but most of the meshes that I see I think you can calculate all fluctuations couse of the fine mesh. In a case a student meshed a geometry of about (highxlenthxwidth) 20cm x 50 cm x 20 cm with round about 4.5 million cells.

Is there any litrature or something like that where I can find some informations. Couse I think that its not worth to build a mesh with 4.5 million cells if you get about the same resolution with 800.000 - 1.000.000 cells.

For any suggestions I ll be very thankful

Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 28, 2012, 09:08
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 6
blacksquirrel is on a distinguished road
The correct way is to estimate you discretization error with a mesh refinement study.
(e.g.:; Roache grid refinement studies)

in short:
You do the same simulation on different meshes (coarse and fine) and compare the solution. Your grid is fine enough, when the difference to the result of a simultaion of a finer grid is less than your margin of error.
plucas likes this.
blacksquirrel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 28, 2012, 09:40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
Posts: 216
Rep Power: 10
colinB is on a distinguished road
Dear Tobi,

the number of cells in your mesh depend highly on what you are actually
Unfortunately I cannot comment on the case from Alberto you mentioned
since I don't do such type of calculations, but for ship hull evaluation
I use the following parameters:

- check the resolution of the boundary layer (y+value e.g. with
checkMesh) this value should be below 300

- resolution of the free surface: over the expected wave hight there
should be a layer of at least 12 cells

- in the area where you are expecting the waves the cells cross section
should be less than a square meter

- finally use a smooth transition from a dense grid to a coarse grid.

in the other areas you might use a coarser grid ( for me sometimes cells
with a volume of several cubic meters
(domain size 500 x 200 x 55 [m x m x m])) and the total number of cells
is sometimes up to 6M cells when using a very dense mesh, but usually
much less (approx. a third of it).

So this is how I end up with my number of cells. But I guess for other
problems the required resolution might be different.

I hope I could contribute

regards Colin

PS: Grüße ins Ländle meine alte Heimat!
colinB is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM hsieh Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 32 September 13, 2011 05:50
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
snappyHexMesh aborting Tobi OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 November 10, 2010 04:23
physical boundary error!! kris CD-adapco 2 August 3, 2005 00:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23.