CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Data Center Air conditioning Boundary Condition problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 31, 2012, 12:01
Default Data Center Air conditioning Boundary Condition problem
  #1
New Member
 
Jay Patel
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14
jaypatel is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers,
I am trying to simulate the flow of air in a data center. I am ready with mesh file but now I have a problem with BC.

I have 4 type of BCs.
1 = CRAC(Computer Room Air Conditioner) -> Suction side -> ? (it will be taking air from the fluid domain
2 = CRAC(Computer Room Air Conditioner) -> Discharge side -> velocity(in will be inlet to the fluid domain.
3 = Air inlet to Server Rack -> ?
4 = Air outlet from Server Rack -> ?
3 and 4 must be having same Flow rate as what ever goes in the server due to suction fan in each server comes out from the other side of server.


The flow diagram is like this.

Air enters the the space from discharge side of CRAC(velocity and flow rate are know) the air passes through server (3) ,get heated and exit from other side of server (4), and again this hot air is suck by the CRAC suction side (1)get cooled and supplied again(2)

Thanks for reading.
jaypatel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2012, 07:24
Default
  #2
Member
 
Dinesh Balaji
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
DineshramBalaji is on a distinguished road
Hi Jay,

I am also working on the same problem. What software are you using and have you decided upon the boundary conditions?
DineshramBalaji is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2012, 12:11
Default Recirc BC
  #3
Member
 
Michael Roth
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17
roth is on a distinguished road
I guess what you need is a recirc boundary condition.

Consider swak4foam, and in particular, groovyBC, and even more specifically, the example "average-t-junction":
http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Co...age-t-junction

For the air inlet to the server rack, you would specify a negative velocity, everything else outflow-like.

At the air outlet from the server rack, you would code up a groovyBC for temperature that grabs the average temperature in the air inlet (Tavg), add in a suitable rise in temperature:

delta T = Heat (W) / ( density (kg/m3) * Cp (J/kg/K) * volume_flow (m3/s) )

and finally apply this temperature (Tavg + deltaT).

The CRAC units, something similar, but with cooling applied.

Boussinesq solver assumed so that we don't have to worry about density.

Hopefully enough info above to get you started.
roth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2012, 19:47
Default
  #4
Member
 
Dinesh Balaji
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
DineshramBalaji is on a distinguished road
Roth,

thanks for the info. Will try it and let you know.
DineshramBalaji is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2013, 20:02
Default Any update
  #5
New Member
 
Alex Lee
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 13
Alex Lee is on a distinguished road
Hi guys, interesting topic!
I am wondering have you guys managed to resolve the problem faced?

I am also working on the same topic and would like to team up with you all.

Alex
Alex Lee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2013, 20:29
Default
  #6
Member
 
Dinesh Balaji
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13
DineshramBalaji is on a distinguished road
Hi Alex,

Kind of. But there is now a problem in modeling the data center using gmsh.
DineshramBalaji is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2013, 00:21
Default Type of BC's on rack & CRAC inlet and outlet
  #7
New Member
 
kedar manohar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 11
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
kedarjan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by roth View Post
I guess what you need is a recirc boundary condition.

Consider swak4foam, and in particular, groovyBC, and even more specifically, the example "average-t-junction":
http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Co...age-t-junction

For the air inlet to the server rack, you would specify a negative velocity, everything else outflow-like.

At the air outlet from the server rack, you would code up a groovyBC for temperature that grabs the average temperature in the air inlet (Tavg), add in a suitable rise in temperature:

delta T = Heat (W) / ( density (kg/m3) * Cp (J/kg/K) * volume_flow (m3/s) )

and finally apply this temperature (Tavg + deltaT).

The CRAC units, something similar, but with cooling applied.

Boussinesq solver assumed so that we don't have to worry about density.

Hopefully enough info above to get you started.
Hello;

The links are fine and UDF's mentioned are also fine. Can we apply BC's without UDF?

Please reply.
I am working on similar project. I have modeled everything in ICEM-CFD and using Fluent for CFD analysis.

Please reply

Thanks and Regards
SSM
kedarjan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 12:12
Question outflow boundary, fixed velocity, pressure boundary setting??
  #8
New Member
 
RB
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12
rbaud is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by roth View Post

For the air inlet to the server rack, you would specify a negative velocity, everything else outflow-like.
Hi,

Nice topic, thanks for the interesting tips.

I've tried something really similar to Roth's advises.
But I'm a bit struggling on the boundary condition of what you named the "rack air inlet":
U: negative velocity --> I assumed it means pointing out/leaving the domain
P: ??? outflow-like ?
Traditionally for an outlet a fixed pressure is used, but it doesn't suit there as it will become overspecify with the velocity already set at fixedValue? So I have apply zeroGradient for the pressure (for P_rgh in my case), as I would have specify in case of a fixed velocity pointing inward my domain.
The simulation runs and hits the convergence criteria but I don't think the flow is acting accordingly to nature of a suction area around my "rack inlet"... i.e weird pressure profile and velocity getting a bit crazy close to the "rack inlet".

Any hint or idea on that particular point??

Thanks all,

R
rbaud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2018, 21:37
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Paul Zhang
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Paulzy is on a distinguished road
Hi Jay

I’m a student at Northeastern University. I’m trying to do a CFD simulation of a data center as well. However, I am completely new to OpenFOAM. I wonder do you still have your files for this project of yours?
Paulzy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2020, 15:04
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Bharath Kumar Kuna
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Bharath Kuna is on a distinguished road
Hello guys!!

I am simulating a data center which has 4 CRAC units. The flow inside the CRAC unit is modeled using the boundary conditions. I have velocity and the temperature defined at each of the inlets of CRAC units.

My question is what should be the velocity and pressure boundary conditions at the outlets so that the continuity equation is satisfied? I did try flowRateInletVelocity and fixedValue for velocities but there was an error with the mass flux.

It would be great if someone could drop a hint.
Thanks in advance.
Bharath Kuna is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transient outlet boundary condition problem jwillie2000 CFX 1 December 7, 2009 17:07
problem with boundary condition??? smn CFX 5 November 24, 2009 06:37
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 04:05
How to resolve boundary condition problem? sam FLUENT 2 July 20, 2003 02:19
a problem with Boundary condition M Rad Main CFD Forum 12 November 27, 1998 12:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:42.