|
[Sponsors] |
Reference on the Lack of Uniqueness of the Cell Volume |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 19, 2012, 08:58 |
Reference on the Lack of Uniqueness of the Cell Volume
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 37 |
Good afternoon to all of you,
I have for a while been looking for a reference, which discuss the volume of a general hexahedral cell, i.e. non-planar faces. I have found some references which hint that the volume of such a hexahedral cell is not uniquely defined, and based on some practical tests with different methods to compute the volume, I have reached the same conclusion. Nonetheless, I would be grateful if anyone of you know about an article, which directly addresses the non-uniqueness in evaluating the volume of a general hexahedral cell. Thank you and Merry Christmas, Niels |
|
December 19, 2012, 13:03 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sandeep Menon
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amherst, MA
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 25 |
Why just hexahedral cells? Any general (non-simplical) polyhedral cell with non-planar faces would apply.
It depends on how you decompose the cell during the calculation. I've seen that a face-and-cell decomposition gives the best results. |
|
December 19, 2012, 13:14 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 17 |
If every face is decomposed consistently, I believe the errors in volume will at least cancel out globally.
|
|
December 19, 2012, 17:09 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 37 |
Good evening,
Thanks for your replies. Right now I am working on an article, where I have found myself in the need to compute the volume of a general hexahedral in order to prove a conservation property, however, since the volume appears to be non-uniquely defined, I find myself unable to give a full proof. Therefore, I would like to be able to refer to a firm/non-arguable statement/proof/article that the volume is indeed non-unique. Kind regards, Niels |
|
December 19, 2012, 19:05 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Niels,
This paper: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...0.1.1.226.4098 mentions that without an expression for the surface that comprises a non-planar face, there is no information available to define it (pg. 5) and you need to make something up and approximate before decomposition. The fact that you need to base your decomposition on some approximation, and volume is a function of that decomposition, tell me that it is not unique. This paper (sec. 4.2): http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=614335 Mentions that you need to be consistent in decomposition. Since you have different options when decomposing a polyhedra, I'm thinking this implies that you can get different volume calculations. If you search around for "tetrahedral subdivisions" or words like that you should find some more useful info. Sorry I can't give you a concrete answer on this. Cheers! Kyle |
|
December 20, 2012, 04:24 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi Kyle,
Thank you, I think those references should do the trick - at least they lend sufficient support to my arguments Merry Christmas, Niels |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 | anand_30 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 7, 2022 17:22 |
OF211: ThirdParty and /src compiled, but not /applications... | vkrastev | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | October 18, 2012 15:53 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 08:56 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 14:00 |
Building OpenFoAm on SGI Altix 64bits | anne | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | June 15, 2006 09:27 |