CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Is OpenFoam Slower Than Starccm?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By fsaltara

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 17, 2013, 22:22
Default Is OpenFoam Slower Than Starccm?
  #1
New Member
 
Md. Naimul Haque
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 3
najunaju is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

Greetings!

I am running, 2D simulation with standard kepsilon model, I have around 100k grid cells.

I run the 10 sec, simulation in Starccm V6. it takes around 4 days in single processor with all second order dicretization.

but the same simulation if I run in OpenFOAM by parallel computing (2 processors) to complete 10 sec simulation is takes 6.5 days. Single processor takes more.


My fvSchemes and fvSolution file are attached here. How can I speed up my case?

Please, help. I will be ever grateful.

fvSchemes.docx

fvSolution.docx
najunaju is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2013, 12:58
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 7
fsaltara is on a distinguished road
In the fvSolution file, Try GAMG (multigrid method) to solve p and pFinal.

And I think that you should avoid under relaxation when using the PISO method. Under relaxation should be used when using the PIMPLE method and employing more than one outer corrector.
wyldckat and najunaju like this.
fsaltara is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2013, 18:39
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 7,326
Blog Entries: 32
Rep Power: 72
wyldckat is a jewel in the roughwyldckat is a jewel in the roughwyldckat is a jewel in the roughwyldckat is a jewel in the rough
Greetings to all!

Another possibility is the Operating System used. Since the initial attachments are of type "docx", that leads me to suspect that both Star-CCM+ and OpenFOAM were executed on Windows. It's best that you use both on Linux, for the best performance!

Yet another note: 2D in Star-CCM+ is probably optimized; while OpenFOAM always does things in 3D, although it can disable the 3rd dimension and run things as if it were 2D.

Best regards,
Bruno
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 04:40
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Md. Naimul Haque
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 3
najunaju is on a distinguished road
Dear fsaltara and Bruno,

Greetings!

Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. I run Starccm in windows and OpenFOAM in Ubuntu.

First, I run Kepsilon model without under relaxation than I found the simulation was used to explode after 10 to 15 iterations. Then I used UR to make the simulation stable. I will remove and try again as u guys have suggested.

Whatever, Thank you very much for our kind advice.
najunaju is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 12 January 19, 2012 03:52
Problem installing OpenFOAM 1.5 installation on RHEL 4. vwsj84 OpenFOAM Installation 4 April 23, 2009 04:48
2009 OpenFOAM Summer School in Zagreb, Croatia hjasak OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 0 March 27, 2009 13:08
Summer School on Numerical Modelling and OpenFOAM hjasak OpenFOAM 5 October 12, 2008 13:14
Getting OpenFOAM to coexist with an existing JAVA VM nik777 OpenFOAM Installation 5 February 22, 2007 07:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:03.