CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

best values for GAMG solver (nCellsInCoarsestLevel , nPreSweeps 0, nPostSweeps)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By chegdan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 5, 2013, 13:52
Default best values for GAMG solver (nCellsInCoarsestLevel , nPreSweeps 0, nPostSweeps)
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 6
mechy is on a distinguished road
what is the best values for GAMG parameters specially for
nCellsInCoarsestLevel , nPreSweeps 0, nPostSweeps

is there a formula to calculate those based on the number of cells ?

Regards
mechy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2013, 11:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
chegdan's Avatar
 
Daniel P. Combest
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis, USA
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 18
chegdan will become famous soon enough
Try this

GAMG hexa vs. tetrahedron meshes

There are several other threads, but the settings and concepts from this thread I use with my own simulations.
songwukong likes this.
__________________
Dan

Find me on twitter @dancombest and LinkedIn
chegdan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 10, 2013, 12:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 6
mechy is on a distinguished road
Dear Daniel
thanks so much for your answer.
in most of OF tutorials the value of nCellsInCoarsestLevel is set to 10 (or 20)
but in your link it is set to 500 (or sqrt(#cell))
do you know why OF used the 10 or 20 values ?

Regards
mechy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 10, 2013, 12:23
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
chegdan's Avatar
 
Daniel P. Combest
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis, USA
Posts: 546
Rep Power: 18
chegdan will become famous soon enough
This is one of those situations where something has been tested and found to work for a particular situation. You can always try the sqrt(ncells), 10, 20, 50 or 100 and then see which one is the best for your case.

I have read that 10 or 20 for larger cases is too low and can be inefficient. Hence why I stay a bit higher with sqrt(nCells). However, its a case by case change.
__________________
Dan

Find me on twitter @dancombest and LinkedIn
chegdan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2013, 12:24
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
kmooney's Avatar
 
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Amherst, MA USA - San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 285
Rep Power: 9
kmooney is on a distinguished road
I've seen similar changes in convergence speed by altering the nCellsInCoarsestLevel setting. In once case I had pressure converge twice as fast for a relatively large case @ 600k cells on about 50 processors. I don't have the solver settings on hand unfortunately.

It is definitely worth investigating before starting big parametric or large parallel cases.
kmooney is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2013, 01:09
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 6
mechy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by chegdan View Post
This is one of those situations where something has been tested and found to work for a particular situation. You can always try the sqrt(ncells), 10, 20, 50 or 100 and then see which one is the best for your case.

I have read that 10 or 20 for larger cases is too low and can be inefficient. Hence why I stay a bit higher with sqrt(nCells). However, its a case by case change.

Hi Daniel

by increasing the nCellsInCoarsestLevel value, the convergency increased but the high value of nCellsInCoarsestLevel may be increase the cpu time for solution
in other word by the high value of nCellsInCoarsestLevel solution converged, certainly
am I right ?

Regards
mechy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves2Foam Related Topics ngj OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1050 August 24, 2015 05:29
Using a user-defined solver in OF ozzythewise OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 February 8, 2011 16:28
CFX 5.5 Roued CFX 1 October 2, 2001 16:49
Setting a B.C using UserFortran in 4.3 tokai CFX 10 July 17, 2001 16:25
Error during Solver cfd guy CFX 4 May 8, 2001 06:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:04.