|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Niels Nielsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 383
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
What are nutilda and R for when solving using simpleFoam?
__________________
Linnemann |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Daniela
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
nuTilda is the kinematic turbulent viscosity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,158
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
and R is the Reynolds Stress tensor.
Best regards, Niels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Niels Nielsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 383
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Hey thanks for the quick reply :-)
__________________
Linnemann |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Leonardo Nettis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi everybody!
concerning R and nutilda I would like to know something more as well!! -First of all, should I iniatilize them with a value different from 0?? -Second, in simpleFoam when I use the k-epsilon model I've read on this forum that they are not necessary. Why?? Thank you in advance. dino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Ivan Lau
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi,
I am running a k-epsilon RNG model (simepleFoam). turbulent, incompressible air flow around a rectangular low rise 3D building I have set the following initial values of inlet: U k=1/2(UI)^2 epsilon=Cmu^0.75*k^1.5/l nuTilda=Cmu&K^2/epsilon (is it correct?) Do I need to set the value of R (currently, zeros)? If so, what should that be? Please kindly advise. Regards, Ivan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Ivan Lau
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi, all,
In regards to boundary conditions, besides inlet, I have the following: outlet, wall, ground, external zeroGradient for every parameters U=0,0,0 at wall & ground p=0 at outlet Should I set k as zero at wall? Re~=10^5 Pleas kindly help. Regards, Ivan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 724
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
You only have to set the fields used by your solver/model. nuTilda and R are not used by the RNG model. For high-Re models k at the wall is normally set to zero gradient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Ivan Lau
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Thanks a lot, Eugene.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Gerard Mouokue
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi openfomers,
I am trying to understand the implementation of simpleFoam but I have a problem with nuTilda. can someone tell me the difference between nut and nuTilda ? Regards Gerard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
HI Gerard,
I dont know the details, however I am also interested. Just a clue: check the C++ documentation: http://foam.sourceforge.net/doc/Doxygen/html/incompressible_2kEpsilon_2kEpsilon_ 8C-source.html 00120 nut_(Cmu_*sqr(k_)/(epsilon_ + epsilonSmall_)) and some details... http://foam.sourceforge.net/doc/Doxygen/html/classFoam_1_1incompressible_1_1RASM odel.html Yet to read it completely. Post here if you find answers to your questions. Regards Rishi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Markus Rehm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Erlangen (Germany)
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with the RSM in simpleFoam | sberg | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | August 15, 2010 07:14 |
| What is phi in simpleFoam | ehsan_vaghefi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 22, 2008 07:14 |
| Using simpleFoam with water | nico765 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | October 23, 2007 05:39 |
| SimpleFoam woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 2 | April 13, 2007 10:15 |
| What does the variables R and nuTilda represent in the icofoam | ztdep | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 18, 2005 22:21 |