CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Fixed mesh method for rigid body motion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 10, 2009, 15:50
Default Hello, A Good Evening to ev
  #1
Senior Member
 
Philippose Rajan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 16
philippose will become famous soon enough
Hello,

A Good Evening to everyone :-)! Hope its not overly cold! Havent seen such temperatures in a long time now!

Anyway, I was looking through the net for methods of treating rigid body motion for CFD, and came across some interesting papers at the website of the CFD software "Flow-3D", by Flow Science (www.flow3d.com)

They call it "General Moving Objects (GMO)" and the "FAVOR" method (which seems to be trademarked by them).

In this approach, a fixed mesh is used, in which the rigid bodies are defined via a combination of Volume Fractions and Area Fractions (which looks very similar to the VOF method) in order to simulate 6-dof motion coupled with fluid flow.

Motion then becomes a variation of the volume and area fraction fields (as a function of time), rather than a physical deformation / modification of the mesh itself.

Has anyone used a similar approach in OpenFOAM, and what would the main disadvantages of this method be? At the face of it, it seems to be "the" solution to large scale motion, without having to worry about mesh quality...remeshing...etc...etc...

It would be great if someone could shed some light on this concept...

As a passing question.... any idea why Flow-3D has not made it bigger? Its been around a while, and their approaches seem to be very novel and interesting....!

Have a great weekend!

Philippose
philippose is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2009, 05:57
Default Hello, I'd say that
  #2
Member
 
nicolas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 8
nico765 is on a distinguished road
Hello,



I'd say that Flow-3D is great at single/multiple body (large) motion. It's probably less accurate at getting good values of resistance (see
Validation of the CFD code Flow-3D for the free surface flow around the ships).
I've tried to raise the question of the moving mesh approach (vs a deforming mesh) in this thread (about a 2D wedge). This approach can and has been successfully used on other cases. CD-Adapco, in their last versions of Star-CCM, have implemented what they called DFBI (dynamic fluid body interaction). Mesh can be body-fitted (could force calculation) and handles well large motions.

In OpenFoam, the only missing parts (that I can see) are the handling of boundary conditions when handling motion. (MRF, 6DOF and VOF solvers are already available)

Regards,
nico765 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rigid body motion + Boundary Layer Manoj Kumar FLUENT 4 May 26, 2012 10:34
simple rigid body motion UDF Dan FLUENT 0 January 11, 2006 06:48
Define the motion of rigid-body CG using profiles! ducvinh FLUENT 2 October 2, 2004 02:50
rigid body motion antonello FLUENT 3 July 28, 2004 03:25
Rigid Body Motion in Eulerian Grid Zi-Wei Chiou Main CFD Forum 0 November 14, 2001 23:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:24.