|December 8, 2006, 12:04||
Hello, I have implemented a
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 96Rep Power: 10
I have implemented a new boundary condition which is similar to the existing "timeVaryingUniformFixedValue". It allows not only the specification of a uniform fixed value for several time instances but also of full boundary fields.
I have used this boundary type to prescribe a boundary velocity to the LES solver (oodles) which has a certain mean value and RMS. When I run the calculation everything is fine and seems to be working well.
The problem is with the results from the averaging procedure in the LES solver. I expected to get the same RMS value on the inlet patch as I had prescribed. But what I get is different. Especially the RMS of the patch-normal velocity is factor 2.5 to high. I cannot say something about the RMS in the internal field of the domain, but they may be ok.
I was wondering if there is an issue with my time interpolation and I checked, but it is all ok.
Furthermore, I have implemented the same averaging procedure (for Umean and R) as in oodles directly into my boundary condition class to average the boundary field without going through the fvPatchField-mechanism. Then I get the expected result!
What may be the reason for the different results? Does anyone have an idea?
Best regards, Hannes
Btw: if someone wants to have a look at the code, it can be found here:
silentdynamics GmbH - http://silentdynamics.de
open source CAE software solutions & support
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Time Varying Equations||Boris Besancon||FLUENT||1||January 14, 2010 13:01|
|sinsoudial time varying BC||cfd-student||CFX||4||May 1, 2008 19:06|
|LES TIME-AVERAGING||Andy||CD-adapco||3||April 19, 2006 17:15|
|Time Varying BC||A.S.||CD-adapco||1||January 31, 2005 07:37|
|Time-averaging of unsteady calculation||dieter||FLUENT||2||October 15, 2004 20:39|