|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Brad
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hello All,
I am currently working on developing a UAV for a university project. Unfortunately, the wind tunnels at my school aren't quite big enough for this uav and I don't want to go through the hassle of building a scale model. I have a very accurate SolidWorks model of the aircraft and would like to use OpenFoam to do some analysis ( specifically, I want to find the control derivitives, so essentially I just need to find the pressure distribution on the surface of the aircraft). Is there a way I can use my SolidWorks model and generate a mesh using an open source software, and than use openfoam to find the pressure distribution on the aircraft. I would prefer to use openfoam ( Its a software I really want to learn), and I would like to use my current SolidWorks model. I know cosmos is an option with solidworks, but I would prefer not to go that route, so please don't go there... Thanks for the Help! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hello Brad,
There are a few opensource meshing tools for OpenFOAM. You might have to export Solidwork file as STL for snappyHexMesh http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/do...pyHexMesh.html Or IGES /STEP for NetGen or Gmsh http://www.hpfem.jku.at/netgen/ http://www.geuz.org/gmsh/ I am not sure if one can get boundary layers with NetGen or Gmsh. SnappyHexMesh does that, but I find it a bit complicated to use. tutorial-> http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...ppyHexMesh.pdf
__________________
Best Regards Rishi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
I forgot to mention EnGrid.
http://www.ohloh.net/p/engrid I have not tested this one yet. Seems promising.
__________________
Best Regards Rishi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Brad
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
And all of the programs you listed work with solidworks? Is there any downside to using Engrid, NetGen, or Gmsh with solidworks ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
These programs work with generic file formats like STL, IGES /STEP
Solidworks or almost any CAD package can export to the above 3 formats. The downside of exporting to such formats is slight loss of accuracy in shape, due to approximations. e.g. it might export a circle as a 10sided polygon. You can increase the accuracy by exporting as 36 sided polygon for better approxitmation.
__________________
Best Regards Rishi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Brad
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
When I download OpenFoam, do these programs come with it or do I need to add it seperately
Thanks, Brad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Rishi .
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
snappyHexMesh is native OpenFOAM.
Others have to be downloaded separately... |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fluent OpenFoam comparison kepsilon model | alimansouri | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | January 19, 2009 09:35 |
| OpenFOAM 13 Intel quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | February 5, 2008 05:26 |
| OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 10, 2007 23:23 |
| Importing Solidworks Assembly | rmc | CFX | 2 | August 17, 2007 03:27 |
| Does OpenFoam have a HybridURANS model | andycong | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | February 16, 2006 21:20 |