|July 22, 2009, 08:13||
binary heavier than ascii
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 55Rep Power: 8
maybe it's a trivial question but as long as I was doing some test to improve my use of openfoam, it appears that compressed binary results are heavier than ascii ones.
My example is: 9000 elements, 100 steps written, constant+system: 2Mo
ascii uncompressed: 89Mo compressed (gzip): 35Mo
binary uncompressed: 79Mo compressed (gzip): 66Mo
I was sure before that binary compressed would be lighter. I think it is not really related to OF, but if someone made the same observation or have an explanation, it would take me out of scepticism.
|July 22, 2009, 08:30||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Niedersachsen, Germany
Posts: 275Rep Power: 9
your analysis is correct AND it should be like this.
The binary is more accurate and the ascii compresses better because the file contains mostly of the 10 numbers + "." + "e".
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Fluent Remote Simulation Facility Service (RSF) di||Rami||FLUENT||2||June 4, 2008 05:38|
|"Memory too low" problem with Fluent HELP NEEDED||Amr||FLUENT||6||May 8, 2006 12:06|
|Error to re-open fluent case file||J.Gimbun||FLUENT||0||April 27, 2006 08:42|
|Sliding mesh error||Karl Kevala||FLUENT||4||February 21, 2001 16:52|
|Binary files stored by Fluent||Jackson||FLUENT||1||April 2, 2000 21:58|