|
[Sponsors] |
August 8, 2009, 05:16 |
Problem with timeVaryingUniformFixedValue
|
#1 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 16 |
i modified the Cavity problem with a moving wall with u=u(t)
in the dictionary 0 there is the initeal of U there: /*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 1.5 | | \\ / A nd | Web: http://www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { movingWall { type timeVaryingUniformFixedValue; fileName "ramp"; outOfBounds clamps; } fixedWalls { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } frontAndBack { type empty; } } // ************************************************** *********************** // in the ramp data ( (0.0 (1 0 0)) (5.0 (10 0 0)) (5.00001 (0.001 0 0)) ) that means after 5s the velocity u of the wall stops the problem is that form t=0s till t=5s the wall velocity is groing that is good and the velocity field simes to be well but after that after t=5s when the wall velocity stops the holleeee velocity field go to zero????? that is not normal it have to slow down |
|
August 8, 2009, 06:57 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
What is your next written timestep after the 5th second?
Maybe your fluid is viscous enought so it allready settled down back to zero velocity in this time period? You can try to decrease the timestep after the 5th second, or increase the fluid viscosity.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
August 8, 2009, 07:07 |
|
#3 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 16 |
hello sega
as you can se the ramp data is ( (0.0 (1 0 0)) (5.0 (10 0 0)) (5.00001 (0.001 0 0)) ) that means from 5 to 5.00001 from 10m/s to 0.001m/s and i donnt think that water is so viscos to get a zero velocity field???? i am really not shure what is going on there and the same problem if i do that means from 5 to 5.00001 from 10m/s to 0m/s so i have no idea |
|
August 8, 2009, 07:14 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Thats not what I am talking about.
Are you writing a timestep directory at 5.00001 or at a later time? Meaning at which timestep are you investigating a zero velocity field?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
August 8, 2009, 07:20 |
|
#5 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 16 |
i get the zero velocity field
5.25s is it by zero and the transport modell /*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 1.5 | | \\ / A nd | Web: http://www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object transportProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // nu nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 0.01; // ************************************************** *********************** // |
|
August 8, 2009, 08:29 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Maybe you can investigate the results at a timestep inbetween 5 and 5.25.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
August 8, 2009, 08:57 |
|
#7 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 16 |
hello sega
i just try it agian at the time step of 5.1s the wall is zero and the field in the box is not zero , i think that is what you means it was to fast and the velocity field is zero (die viskosität ist wharschinlich so hoch gewessen das es sofort dann abgeklungen ist) thank you very much that menas i now cann start wall velocity that is time dependent |
|
August 8, 2009, 09:03 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Yes! Thats what I meant.
Now have fun with all the upcoming simulations and don't hesitate to ask.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 04:43 |
Incoherent problem table in hollow-fiber spinning | Gianni | FLUENT | 0 | April 5, 2008 10:33 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 06:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 19:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 14:52 |