|September 23, 2009, 11:37||
Velocity gradient manipulation
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 9Rep Power: 7
in order to get on the OpenFoam software, I calculated an example from an industrial task with CFX and OpenFoam (simpleFoam). I tired to choose all BC to be equal (discretization, turbulence model, mesh, time step, etc.). The results were very interesting, because on the one hand the integral flow field in the domain was nearly the same, but on the other hand local differences in the flow field occured, which I try to understand now. The main differences were divergent velocity gradients in regions of a direction change and in regions where a secondary flow (as a results of the direction change) was present. So I varried nearly all numerical parameters in OpenFoam (discretization, non-orth. correctors, dT, relaxation factors, etc.) in order to understand if it is influenced by the numerical adjustment or maybe it is something different. My result was, when the flow field stabilzed (converged) during the calculation, that every change of the numerical parameters affected the flow field only in a negligible manner, even the discretization scheme for the convection. This was really surprising.
My question is now, has someone experience in manipulating the flow field (especially the gradient calculation/ treatment) in OpenFoam by using the numerical parameters, or has someone an idea where this divergence might come from?
P.S I calculated the same problem with FLUENT, the results were identical to the results of CFX, especially regarding to the velocity gradient calculation.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|UDF sample for velocity gradient||J.Y.Shin||FLUENT||2||January 19, 2007 19:04|
|Variables Definition in CFX Solver 5.6||R P||CFX||2||October 26, 2004 02:13|
|Velocity gradient||Stephen||FLUENT||0||April 7, 2003 10:29|
|Velocity gradient||Stephen||Main CFD Forum||0||April 7, 2003 10:28|
|Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History||Abhi||Main CFD Forum||12||July 8, 2002 09:11|