CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

The FOAM Documentation Project - SHUT-DOWN

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree5Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 6, 2013, 16:17
Default
  #241
Senior Member
 
Dr. Alexander Vakhrushev
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 9
makaveli_lcf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to makaveli_lcf
Ahaha) great opinion) you are probably right, Niklas, myself as an example need several month without doing anything else to complete a consistent documentation for my solvers and utils. Now it is just a bunch of 100 pages where only I know the trace. But I will ask Henry in Frankfurt anyway)
__________________
Best regards,

Dr. Alexander VAKHRUSHEV

Christian Doppler Laboratory for "Advanced Process Simulation of
Solidification and Melting"

Simulation and Modelling of Metallurgical Processes
Department of Metallurgy
University of Leoben

Franz-Josef-Str. 18
A - 8700 Leoben
Österreich / Austria
Tel.: +43 3842 - 402 - 3125
http://smmp.unileoben.ac.at
makaveli_lcf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2013, 05:14
Default
  #242
Senior Member
 
Elvis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sindelfingen, Germany
Posts: 541
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 12
elvis is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by niklas View Post
A well documented code base would have a positive influence on the spreading of foam for all.
Spreading OpenFoam is what Hrv Jasak & Hendrik Rusche does by giving
OF Summerschools and supporting the OF Workshops.
Holger Marschall´s (a summerschool participant) intention was to find out where the "leading" OF research groups are, and what their area of expertice was. I remember he was not disapointed what he received but was not allowed to publish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by niklas View Post
It sounds to me like you think they are not writing the documentation to have a smaller user base...on purpose.
I think its pretty safe to say that that is not the case.
I am 100% sure that the reason they havent written anything yet is because lack of money and/or time.
A SGI employee that was invited to give a talk at Munich OF-Stammtisch said (not during the offical talk) SGI´s purchase was due to commercial "problems" by OpenCFD. But others at the Stammtisch had doubts and said the purchase was made because SGI feared to lose OpenCFD`s partnership. OpenCFD gave all trainings at SGI´s Training Locations, and Volkswagen (SGI´s largest customer in Europe) was about buying new Clusters!
Cray was able to support OpenFoam on HPC (Cray XE6 => "PRACE" [once again with Cray employee that went thru OF Summerschool])
Quote:
Originally Posted by niklas View Post
Here's how I see it, just as a counter to your view.
The fact they dont let anyone else write their documentation is a sign of quality.
I think they feared that ICON could get to much of the OF-cake! => ICON´s "OpenFOAM Conference" had to be renamed into "Open Source CFD International Conference". And that volunteers Code- documentation would be the straw that breaks the camels back. Do not forget that it would be peer reviewed by OF users and their feedback.
Just one more question! Would you send your lawyer to someone who co-reviews your government funded contract, just because of a ridiculous hobby project?
elvis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2013, 13:30
Default
  #243
Senior Member
 
Holger Marschall
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 9
holger_marschall is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to holger_marschall
Dear all,

I think it's really of no significance what has been done by whom and when. It just doesn't matter, since this was of no effect and no impact as of today. I.e., it's past since a couple of years now.

This thread has been viewed over 33,570 times and over 240 posts are in here. Just thinking of the situation today, if these efforts and energy would have been devoted to reviewed, precise and concise technical documentation... even targeted at a very limited aspect of FOAM technology, like the library's top-level applications as intended by the documentation project. Certainly, this would have been a win-win scenario for all.

best regards,
__________________
Holger Marschall
web: http://www.holger-marschall.info
mail: holgermarschall@yahoo.de
holger_marschall is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/69068-foam-documentation-project-shut-down.html
Posted By For Type Date
?????????So-net blog This thread Refback October 18, 2009 19:46
Horse Bits This thread Refback October 17, 2009 16:36
OpenFOAM(r) related posts removed This thread Pingback October 13, 2009 13:57

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 15:11
Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 15:00
Import gmsh msh to Foam adorean Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 24 April 27, 2005 09:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35.