CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

parallel results different depending on decomposition strategy

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 3, 2009, 11:52
Smile parallel results different depending on decomposition strategy
  #1
New Member
 
Francesco
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 8
franzisko is on a distinguished road
hello,
I performed a simulation using simpleFoam and for different parallelization strategies: number of processors, simple/hierarchical/... I get slightly different results. Is there anyone which knows it is ok, or if there is any problem. The difference seems to be small (more or less 1% on drag coefficient for the stationary solution). Where is the part depending on the decomposition method?

thanks a lot,
Francesco
franzisko is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2009, 04:07
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Anonymous
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 8
madad2005 is on a distinguished road
Hi Francesco,

I've been having some wider-spread issues with using foam in parallel. I'm assuming the differences you are seeing are due to decomposition of the domain each time with different regions having different ghost cells. 1% does appear to be a lot though. Interestingly, I'm finding that when attempting to run foam in parallel, it appears it is trying to run N number of serial jobs and is killing the memory on my machine. Have you seen similar behaviour?

Regards,

Adriano
madad2005 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2009, 06:35
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Anonymous
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 8
madad2005 is on a distinguished road
Well, I finally resolved my problem. I was missing the -parallel command out when executing the parallel job.
madad2005 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2009, 07:37
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Francesco
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 8
franzisko is on a distinguished road
hi adriano,

thanks for your suggestion concerning ghost nodes. I think 1% is a bit too much, too. however, the fields are very similar each other, hence I hope there is no serious problem

intersting behaviour missing -parallel...

bye, francesco
franzisko is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
error, parallel, results, simplefoam

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 Rajeev Kumar Singh FLUENT 6 December 19, 2010 12:33
MPICH Parallel Run Error on the Windows Server2003 Saturn CFX 3 August 29, 2006 08:42
results with parallel processing Muhammad Shakaib Main CFD Forum 1 December 29, 2005 01:56
CFX-5.7 MPICH Parallel Problem (Output of Results) James Date CFX 7 February 15, 2005 17:03
parallel mode - small problem? co2 FLUENT 2 June 1, 2004 23:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04.