CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Decomposition Methods

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By olesen

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 7, 2010, 13:03
Default Decomposition Methods
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
misakagan is on a distinguished road
What decomposition method (Metis, Scotch, simple, hierarchical) you guys favor for large scaled simulations?
misakagan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 03:22
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 777
Rep Power: 18
olesen will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by misakagan View Post
What decomposition method (Metis, Scotch, simple, hierarchical) you guys favor for large scaled simulations?
Metis or scotch is what we use, since we generally don't have a better idea ourselves of how to decompose the domain any better (nor the time to figure it out anew for each geometry / cpu count combination).

Simply try out metis/scotch and see if you are happy with the results. You can view the separate processor* domains in paraview (eg, via paraFoam) to see if it matches up with your expectations.

BTW: I believe that future versions of OpenFOAM might be switching to scotch instead of metis due to licensing aspects. I found that the scotch decomposition was fairly similar to metis anyhow.
rajibroy likes this.
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 05:35
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
BastiL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 471
Rep Power: 11
bastil is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by olesen View Post
BTW: I believe that future versions of OpenFOAM might be switching to scotch instead of metis due to licensing aspects. I found that the scotch decomposition was fairly similar to metis anyhow.
Regarding licensing I think you may use Metis from 1.5 for testing purposes only. Otherwise, you need to have a license for that. Afaik this is the main reason why it changed to scotch in 1.6.
What I miss is a parallel partitioning method freeing us from the need to have machines with very large memory.

Regards
bastil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 05:38
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
misakagan is on a distinguished road
Hi.

I'm using also scotch or metis since they do not require any manual input. I checked the subdomains in paraview and they seem to be convenient. But the problem is that I get a terrible speed-up (scaling) if I increase the processor number. In other words, nearly all computational effort is invested on solving the pressure-poisson equation in PISO loop, which does not scale well with increased processor number.

Are you satisfied with parallelisation of OpenFOAM? I'm asking because considering this computational performance I can not simulate anything big. Maybe I'm doing something wrong.
misakagan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 05:58
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 777
Rep Power: 18
olesen will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by bastil View Post
Regarding licensing I think you may use Metis from 1.5 for testing purposes only. Otherwise, you need to have a license for that.
Here https://projects.coin-or.org/BuildTo...Metis?rev=1294 it states
Quote:
For commercial-use, the essential restriction is for the vendors not to be reselling Metis.
The restriction appears to apply to the vendor, not the end-user - http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/met...faq#distribute

Last edited by olesen; January 8, 2010 at 06:07. Reason: added reference to faq
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
domain decomposition, parallel computing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain decomposition method Bram OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 October 12, 2009 09:14
Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS Dave Rudolf Main CFD Forum 10 January 29, 2007 11:13
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
Intl Conf Computational Methods in Fluid Power Jacek Stecki Main CFD Forum 0 November 10, 2002 06:49
Projection methods ZY Sun Main CFD Forum 9 September 15, 2000 18:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44.