CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM

Body in windtunnel - high preassure behind the body?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 12, 2010, 07:42
Default Body in windtunnel - high preassure behind the body?
  #1
New Member
 
Andreas Jörg
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 7
Andyjoe is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I'm investigating the airdrag of a objekt in the wind tunnel. I'm using the simpleFoam solver, running at a speed of 200 m/s. The inlet preassure and the initial preassure field is set to 0. I used this preassure values, because I basically use the motorBike tutorial, and 0 preassure is the value used there.
My result is far away from that, what I expected: Behind the body, the preassure becomes bigger, then in the stream before the body.
I think the reason might be, that the airspeed behind the body decreases, and lower speed means higher preassure. But I don't think, that this has anything to do with reality The calculated drag of the body is 0,022 which is far away from the measured which is about ~0.5. So I wonder whats going wrong, because the motorBike tutorial is a tutorial about calculating the forces, so the settings should be ok. Has anyone an idea, what could go wrong? Thanks in advance.
Andyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2010, 09:13
Default
  #2
Member
 
Costas K
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 7
thekay is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to thekay Send a message via MSN to thekay
Maybe it would be better if you used a compressible solver for this amount of speed? In my eyes it is way too large for simpleFoam.
thekay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2010, 09:22
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Andreas Jörg
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 7
Andyjoe is on a distinguished road
Thanks for replying. What kind of solver would you commend? sonicFoam only works at speeds above Ma = 1. 200m/s is the absolute maximum speed that occurs, U_inf is 170m/s. Thats fast, but only about Ma ~ 0.5, so from the physical point of view it would be correct to assume that the air is incompressible. And I don't think this assumption has influence of the simulation, because the solver don't know that air is incompressible, so everything is consistent. And I think I have seen simpleFoam solutions in which base drag occurs. But maybe I'm wrong.
In the first post I have forgot to mention, that I'm using the k-omega-sst model.
Andyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 05:10
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 8
Thomas Baumann is on a distinguished road
Hi Andyjoe,
I'm not sure if you're right using an incompressible solver. The machnumber is too high. I think it should be smaller than 0.2 for using incompressible solvers.

Regards Thomas
Thomas Baumann is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2010, 11:57
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Andreas Jörg
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 7
Andyjoe is on a distinguished road
I already tried to use a velocity of 20 m/s. I also checked the viscosity, because it seems that it would be to low.
I atached three images of the run with 20 m/s, argunaIIIanimU shows the velocity distribution, argunaIIIanimP the pressure distribution and argunaIIIHeck shows the velocity vectors at the base of the rocket. So there are vortices, altough the force coefficients given by libforces are unrealistic. The cd value should be about 0.015, while the value measured in reality is about 0.7. The dimensions of the simulated rocket are equal to the dimensions of the real rocket, 3.2m.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg argunaIIIanimU.0014.jpg (38.5 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg argunaIIIanimP.0017.jpg (16.5 KB, 25 views)
File Type: png argunaIII_Heck.png (45.5 KB, 30 views)
Andyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
High speed flow problems Sawa FLUENT 3 January 14, 2003 02:10
Problem about 3D blunt body high Re simulation David FLUENT 0 September 27, 2002 10:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:22.