|June 15, 2010, 06:03||
DNS - interDymFoam compare
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freiburg, Germany
Posts: 27Rep Power: 8
Actually I'm looking for a model on VoF basis to simulate an evaporation.
I read much about interDymFoam and it's dynamic mesh refinement. I could imagine that the effort to compute a new mesh every time step is pretty high and i.e. in cases of high vapor fraction we have a large volume fraction of refined regions to.
So if I already refined the main part of my model, should it be a big difference to use DNS instead ?
Is there anyone who have some experience of the calculation time of interDymFoam in compare to DNS ?
Thanks in advance,
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|interDyMFoam with GGI in 3d||stawrogin||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||January 5, 2011 03:17|
|DNS in Turbulent S.O.S. Urgent||Hengky||FLUENT||11||September 28, 2006 10:07|
|what is DNS ?||Phillip||Main CFD Forum||10||August 28, 2003 15:28|
|Complicated Homogeneous Shear DNS||ff_fan||Main CFD Forum||0||December 9, 2002 19:23|
|DNS of homogeneous shear flow: comments please!||ff_fan||Main CFD Forum||1||September 12, 2002 02:28|