CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/)
-   -   Problems scaling down the mesh of a stirred tank (GGI, icoDyMFoam) (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/79440-problems-scaling-down-mesh-stirred-tank-ggi-icodymfoam.html)

Tobb August 24, 2010 07:27

Problems scaling down the mesh of a stirred tank (GGI, icoDyMFoam)
 
Hello everybody!

For this is my first post in this forum, I hope I opened this thread in the right place.

I' ve got a problem simulating the flow in a stirred tank using icoDyMFoam and GGI.
The mesh consists of one cylinder (height 20cm, diameter 15cm), the shaft (also a cylinder, diameter 5mm) and the impeller with for blades (diameter 2,5cm).
I created the mesh in Gambit, but with the dimensions in meters, I intended to scale them afterwards using "transformpoints".

When I ran my case for the first time, I forgot to scale my mesh so I used the values in meters and not in centimeters. However the results where pretty fine, the velocity field and distribution of pressure looked the way I expected. (rpm = 60 1/minute)

But when I scaled my case to the desired dimensions and changed the rotational frequency to 30 rpm (as my tutor recommended), my simulation got really bad. The velocity field got kind of asymmetric, my maximum pressure became even negativ!

I "played around" trying different values for the rotational frequency. I managed to get good results with a case being just ten times smaller then my original mesh (as I said I need a case 100 times smaller because of converting my mesh from m to cm) using rpm = 600 1/minute. This is equivalent to the same peripheral velocity of the impeller as in the first case. Yet I didn't consider this to be the right way because I shouldn't need to achieve the same peripheral velocity but rather the same reynolds number, it is to say, the same outer conditions for the flow. Especially in order to stay in laminar region as icoDyMFoam ist a solver for incompressible and laminar flow as i know.
For stirred tanks I found the formula
Re = (f * d^2)/nu
But this would mean my frequency would grow quadratically. Concering my case I would have to increase my frequency by a factor of 10000, to me this seems to be nonsense.

I have the impression that I am overlooking a fundamental fault and could ruin my reputation before I really have one. ;)
I suppose there are some rules for "down-scaling" that I am not aware of. So I would be glad if someone could slightly point out to me, where I have to search my mistake.
Thank you in advance,

Tobb

stainboy January 31, 2013 11:12

Hello Tobb,

have you found solution for your problem? Since OpenFOAM respects units I'm wondering if when I would like to have my solution scaled to cm, is it necessary just to scale viscosity to cm^2/s, pressure to s^2/cm^2 and velocity to cm/s.

Kuba.

Alucard February 7, 2013 13:06

If your mesh is in meters just scale the velocity (or the viscosity) in order to have the right Re number you desire.

If you have problems increasing your Re number start with lower values and increment it until you start seeing "weird things" happening in your system and analyse the mesh resolution and/or the advective scheme used.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.