|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Dear Foamers,
![]() What is the meaning of Co number in the pisoFoam for example. what should be its range? is it important in implicit methods? i know it is for stability. how much it can be large? please talk about the role and magnitude of this number in solving methods. Regards, Maysam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 765
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Read Peric or Patankar about the PISO method and you will see assumptions are made that require a Courant number limit. This is independent of the implicit / explicit time marching scheme. For an incompressible flow you should get away with Co < 1, but there are cases (eg. VOF) that may require an even tighter criterion to produce nicer results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mesh Refinement | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities | 41 | January 17, 2013 02:43 |
| DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 09:01 |
| Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 10:37 |
| Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 18:07 |
| Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |