[kroetenechse]

Hello, i´m a new OpenFOAM user.

Could somebody give me a advice, how I can calculate k (turbulent kinematic energy) and epsilon (dissipation rate) on every boundary for my k-epsilon-model.

And the calculation of epsilon, k and omega for my k-w-SST-Model. Do I need also nuTilda for the k-w-SST-Model?

If someone can help me, I would be very happy.

Thank you in advance.
phil

[Simon Lapointe]

Hi,

At the inlet, the values of k and epsilon can be calculated using the level of turbulence intensity and viscosity ratio (or turbulent length scale) you want to achieve. The relations found on this page can be useful:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbu...ary_conditions

On wall boundary conditions, you use kqRWallFunction and epsilonWallFunction since the k-epsilon model makes use of wall functions.

For the k-w SST model, you need to specify BCs for k and omega, not epsilon nor nuTilda.

Hope this helps.

[kroetenechse]

Hi Simon,

thank you very much! Now I could calculate epsilon, k and omega. This was one of my main problems. You don´t know, how you helped me with that information :-). Also for these three variables I found some functions:
turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet for k in the inlet (under that you make the description of the intensity and the value)
turbulentMixingLengthFrequencyInlet for omega in the inlet (then description mixing length, k and value)
turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet for epsilon in the inlet (then description mixing length and value)
...like that for example k

inlet
{
type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet;
intensity 0.02;
value uniform 0.0006;
}

But relating to the wallfunctions I need a little bit more support, please. I´m really sorry.

- For the k-epsilon-model I can use kqRWallFunction for k and for epsilon I can use epsilonWallFunction?
like that?
[k]
wall
{
type kqRWallFunction;
value uniform ...;
}

- Are there more wallfunctions for the k-omega-SST model?

- what can I use for the outlet?

- what means type zerogradient? The variabel will not change in that boundary?

Thank you in Advance
phil

[Gerard]

Hi Philipp,

as far as I know you can use kqRWallFunction for k, epsilonWallFunction for epsilon and omegaWallFunction for omega. Furthermore there are Wall Functions for nut (implying that you want to do incompressible calculations), such as nutWallFunction or nutSpalartAllmarasWallFunction. Have a look at the code in your Openfoam directory /src/turbulenceModels/incompressible/RAS/derivedFvPatchFields/wallFunctions for details and further wall functions.
If you want to use kOmegaSST it is clear that you need to specify omega instead of epsilon.
I hope this helps a little bit. I am afraid, but I am new both to CFD in general and to OpenFoam in particular.


Hi everybody,

as I just mentioned, I'm new to CFD and OpenFoam. So I hope it is not to annoying to ask you a simple question:
the value specified for a wall function, should it be the value at the wall (k=0,...) or at the first grid point let's say at 40 y+?

Thanks.
Gerard

[vkrastev]

Originally Posted by Gerard

Hi Philipp,

as far as I know you can use kqRWallFunction for k, epsilonWallFunction for epsilon and omegaWallFunction for omega. Furthermore there are Wall Functions for nut (implying that you want to do incompressible calculations), such as nutWallFunction or nutSpalartAllmarasWallFunction. Have a look at the code in your Openfoam directory /src/turbulenceModels/incompressible/RAS/derivedFvPatchFields/wallFunctions for details and further wall functions.
If you want to use kOmegaSST it is clear that you need to specify omega instead of epsilon.
I hope this helps a little bit. I am afraid, but I am new both to CFD in general and to OpenFoam in particular.


Hi everybody,

as I just mentioned, I'm new to CFD and OpenFoam. So I hope it is not to annoying to ask you a simple question:
the value specified for a wall function, should it be the value at the wall (k=0,...) or at the first grid point let's say at 40 y+?

Thanks.
Gerard

The value you specify for a wall function is only an initial guess (as it is the initial value for the internal field), so theoretically speaking it could be quite arbitrary. However, you can (of course) "accomodate" the convergence of the solver by choosing a more "reasonable" value: one common practice (you can see it also in some of the tutorials, for instance the pitzDaily incompressible steady-state case) is to estimate the initial turbulent quantities for the internal field and then use the same values as initial guesses for the wall function entry.
Hope this helps

V.

[Gerard]

Hi Vesselin,

thank you for your reply!
Do I get you right, that the values specified for the wall functions are initial values and not "classical boundary conditions", that need to be fulfilled within every time step?
So theoretically it would be desirable to set it to the estimated value of the first grid point next to the wall? At the moment I just define uniform values for the internal field
Thanks again.

Gerard

[vkrastev]

Originally Posted by Gerard

Do I get you right, that the values specified for the wall functions are initial values and not "classical boundary conditions", that need to be fulfilled within every time step?

Yes. If you have a look in the source code, you will see that the wall function for k simply impose a zeroGradient condition at the wall, while the while function for epsilon calculate (for each timestep) the first grid point value by using an algebraic expression derived from the classical logarithmic law-of the wall approach.

Originally Posted by Gerard

So theoretically it would be desirable to set it to the estimated value of the first grid point next to the wall?

Yes, but if you use a reasonable assumption for the internal field initial value (for instance, estimating a turbulence intensity and a turbulent lenght scale for the bulk or free-stream flow), then it should do a good job as well.

Best regards

V.

[Gerard]

Thank you very much! That really helped me.

Best regards
Gerard

[kroetenechse]

Thanks to all,

my calculation did run now. You were a great help.

Thanks a lot.

phil

[vishal]

Hi,

I have some same problem please have a look at following post...



http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...urbulence.html

[jms]

Dear all,

while solving one case of flow over an airfoil with the turbulence model k-omega SST I would like to compute the values of omega at the wall. In OpenFOAM it seems that you can only call it as a "fixedValue", not as "calculated". I tried to call the wall as a "patch" instead of a "wall" and it does not work either. I get the following error:

gradientInternalCoeffs cannot be called for a calculatedFvPatchField
on patch blabla of field omega in file "/.../omega"
You are probably trying to solve for a field with a default boundary condition.

The reason why I want to set it as "calculated" is because I have run the same case in ANSYS CFX and I saw that it gave different values for this omega at the wall. Thus, by fixing it, maybe it is affecting to the results obtained.

Thank you very much for your help,

Regards,

José

[Gerard]

Hi José,

I'm not sure because I have just used OF for a few months now, but maybe you use an older version of OF which automatically applies wallfunctions to omega with SST? Did you check that?

Gerard

[umer.chaudrey]

Hey everyone,

I have a query regarding K-epsilon values too.

I am using a transient compressible rhoPimpleFoam solver, RAS turbulence model but without any wall functions for k and epsilon.

Whatever I read in various threads on this forum, I understand that initial values of internal fields of k & epsilon are independent of the solution.

But however in my case, if I use different values my solution behaviour and values change. Can anyone please comment on that?

I had written on another thread too, but no one replied regarding specific k & epsilon intial values for internal field. I am not using a velocity boundary condition, rather pressure difference.

Thanks, I will really appreciate some advice.

[romant]

Originally Posted by umer.chaudrey

Hey everyone,

I have a query regarding K-epsilon values too.

I am using a transient compressible rhoPimpleFoam solver, RAS turbulence model but without any wall functions for k and epsilon.

Whatever I read in various threads on this forum, I understand that initial values of internal fields of k & epsilon are independent of the solution.

But however in my case, if I use different values my solution behaviour and values change. Can anyone please comment on that?

I had written on another thread too, but no one replied regarding specific k & epsilon intial values for internal field. I am not using a velocity boundary condition, rather pressure difference.

Thanks, I will really appreciate some advice.

If you use wall function less RANS models (RAS in OF) then you need to check with the turbulence model which boundary conditions it suggests for k and epsilon. those models usually require also that the first cell is within y+ < 1.

[umer.chaudrey]

First of all thanks for your reply Roman.

But how do I check y+ values in OF when I am not using any wall functions.

According to my knowledge, the yPlusRAS utility in OF only gives y+ values when wall functions are being used. Not without them.

Correct me if I am wrong, as I am only new to this.

[romant]

you can check with this thread

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-testcase.html

where somebody has posted a tool in order to calculate the y+ values for low reynolds number models which do not use wall functions.

[umer.chaudrey]

Roman

Thanks, for the link. I will just have a look at it.

[umer.chaudrey]

And Roman, please comment on this last thing before I check the y+ code.

The thing is the documentations I have read about OpenFOAM and in the threads here, for k-epsilon model to calculate the initial values of k and epsilon, I need mean flow velocity and a turbulent length scale.

k= 3/2*(UI)^2 or k = 1/2 U'.U'

I can determine the turbulent length scale based on my geometry. But I do not know the mean flow velocity, because I am generating flow based on pressure difference. The initial velocity everywhere in the model is zero at time zero. The initial conditions I mean.

So I was wondering just for that initial values in my 0 folder, how do I determine the k and epsilon value based on these relations given for my internal field and outlet, even before I run my solution.

Thanks.

[romant]

I would use an estimate of the mean flow velocity and then run the simulation once. you then will see what your velocity becomes. you can then also see your k values and epsilon values, which can then be used as your inlet conditions.

[umer.chaudrey]

Okay thanks again for the help, appreciate it. I'll just do that.