can anyone explian the logic behind defining the vertices

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 November 10, 2010, 15:39 can anyone explian the logic behind defining the vertices #1 Member   Sandeep Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 48 Rep Power: 8 I am not able to figure out the direction chosen for defining the vertices in the example figure 5.6 explained in this following link. http://www.openfoam.com/docs/user/blockMesh.php may be they have not defined the lengths of the edges and now am not able to figure out the lengths from the vertices definition. Thanks for the help Sandeep

 November 10, 2010, 17:33 #2 Senior Member   David Gaden Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Winnipeg, Canada Posts: 436 Rep Power: 14 Hi Sandeep, Your question isn't very clear. I'm not sure what you are asking... If it's about finding the length of the edges, then look at example blockMeshDict files. The points are listed first. The order in which they appear is their number. Code: ``` (0 0 0) // point 0 (0 0.1 0) // point 1 (0.1 0.1 0) // point 2 (0.1 0 0) // point 3``` Then when the blocks are defined, they are done according to the numbering in the figure you pointed out. CCW around the bottom, then CCW around the top, as seen from above. You can infer the length of each side by the points list above. Lastly, you should pay attention to the axis directions defined (shown as x1, x2 and x3 in the diagram). The simpleGrading or edgeGrading lists are based on these axes, not a global coordinate system. Is that what you wanted to know?

November 10, 2010, 19:08
#3
Member

Sandeep
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by marupio Hi Sandeep, Your question isn't very clear. I'm not sure what you are asking... If it's about finding the length of the edges, then look at example blockMeshDict files. The points are listed first. The order in which they appear is their number. Code: ``` (0 0 0) // point 0 (0 0.1 0) // point 1 (0.1 0.1 0) // point 2 (0.1 0 0) // point 3``` Then when the blocks are defined, they are done according to the numbering in the figure you pointed out. CCW around the bottom, then CCW around the top, as seen from above. You can infer the length of each side by the points list above. Lastly, you should pay attention to the axis directions defined (shown as x1, x2 and x3 in the diagram). The simpleGrading or edgeGrading lists are based on these axes, not a global coordinate system. Is that what you wanted to know?

Hi david,

Thanks for the reply. Its my bad that i am not clear in my question. My question is that vertices for the figure 5.6(single block) are mentioned under the section 5.3.1.1 at 'the vertices' in the link i have sent. Now that am not able to visualize the same figure with the defined vertices. Also there are no lengths defined in the figure 5.6 and how the vertices were defined by taking 0.1 in one direction and 1 in another direction etc. Also for some vertices he has taken -ve value which looks impossible for the figure.

the vertices you have sent do not match with the list in the link. i wonder if you are refering to the same figure??

Also i want to know the x y and z directions are same as x1, x2 and x3 directions in the figure 5.6?

Thanks and regards
sandeep

 November 11, 2010, 01:18 #4 Senior Member   Nakul Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: India Posts: 147 Rep Power: 8 Hi, The vertices that have been defined in the link are defined correctly. x1, x2 and x3 can be assumed as x,y,z directions respectively. The lengths are arbitary here as this is just an illustration of defining vertices in blockMeshDict. In an actual case the choice of vertices would be detrmined by the dimensions of your domain. Besides that figure is not an exact representation of those vertices. You can safely assume the figure to be a representation to understand the procedure. If you are having trouble visualising these vertices try making your own rough figure on paper.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post anger OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 22 December 15, 2015 03:06 Josh ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 July 19, 2011 16:09 Josh ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 10 July 8, 2010 02:39 Tom CD-adapco 3 October 3, 2006 19:18 Chris CD-adapco 6 May 18, 2005 02:50

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:34.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top