# Modeling Evaporation at a Heated Wall

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 10, 2011, 10:20 Modeling Evaporation at a Heated Wall #1 Member   Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 35 Rep Power: 6 Hi Foamers, I want to model nucleate boiling in cylindrical pipes, and one important part in nucleate boiling is ... boiling at the wall! I use the Kurul & Podowski heat flux partitioning. In my solver I calculate the three contributions. The evaporation heat flux density q_e is defined as volScalarField which is null everywhere except for near wall cells where: q_e=Pi/6*d_dep³*freq*NSD*rho_v*h_lv (where d_dep is the departure diameter of bubbles,freq the detachment frequency, NSD the nucleation site density and h_lv is the latent heat). Once this is known I can determine the evaporation mass flow rate at the wall, in [kg/m²/s], which is defined as: m_e = q_e/h_lv But all the equations solved in my solver (alphaEqn, UEqns, ...) are dealing with cells, meaning finite volumes, therefore I need a volume evaporation rate, whose unit is in [kg/m³/s]. I thought about calculating it as : Gamma_e = m_e*(area of the cell in contact with the heated wall)/(volume of the cell) But if x is the direction of the flow: Gamma_e = m_e*(x_cell*z_cell)/(x_cell*y_cell*z_cell) = m_e/y_cell And my evaporation rate depends on the mesh refinement which is of course non physical... Has anyone an idea how to solve this problem? Cause I've been thinking about it for a couple of days unsuccessfully... Thanks for reading, giving a tip or helping! Best, /Edouard

 February 10, 2011, 10:28 #2 Member   Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 35 Rep Power: 6 I wrote "mass flow rate" for m_e but it is indeed rather a evaporation mass flux!

 February 11, 2011, 05:32 #3 Senior Member   Nima Sam Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tehran, Iran Posts: 1,123 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 14 in openFoam there is no interface reconstruction so you can not convert mass flux into mass evaporation per volume! like : massflux * interfaceArea/ volume you can only use mag(grad(alpha)) which seems its not compeletly true for local interface area estimation how ever i eager in this subject, can u share ur efforts (aricles and source code)? nimasam65 <@> gmail.com

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post MOhaj Main CFD Forum 0 April 25, 2010 00:21 MOhaj FLUENT 0 April 24, 2010 23:54 ztdep Main CFD Forum 0 March 23, 2010 23:08 Jimmy CD-adapco 10 March 18, 2008 16:28 Lawrence J CFX 0 November 30, 2004 10:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:35.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top