|February 14, 2011, 05:44||
attachdetach turbulence b.c.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 136Rep Power: 8
I ve a problem to set up a case with topological changes (OpenFoam 1.6-ext). I like to simulate a spark ignited engine with a pent roof, including valves. So far I managed to adapt a mesh motion class to my requirements. In order to close and open the valves a small curtain surface around the valve is introduced by the attachdetach meshModifier. The mesh works fine. I ve tested it with a pure mesh motion solver, but with egineDyMFoam (adjusted to the engineTopChangerMesh class) it doesn’t t work.
Segmentation fault when the turbulence->correct() is called. Till this step everything works fine.
Remark: Without the attachdetach meshModifier( turbulence on) it works and with attachdetach (turbulence off) it works as well. It seems that I ve a problem with the boundary conditions of the attachdetach faces for the turbulence model.
Furthermore, with 1.5-dev it works without a problem. There, the turbulence model doesn’t t ask for boundary conditions for the attachdetach faces but in 1.6-ext it does.
Does anyone has used the attachdetach approach in 1.6-ext so far with a turbulence model?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|B.C. for turbulence||prashant.801||FLUENT||0||October 8, 2010 10:51|
|Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!!||Wen Long||Main CFD Forum||3||May 15, 2009 09:52|
|Recommended values on turbulence B.C.||Jihwan||CD-adapco||2||August 10, 2005 07:45|
|¡¾Q¡¿inflow turbulence B.C. of k-epsilon model?||David||Main CFD Forum||2||October 10, 2003 10:54|