CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

blockCoupled solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 16, 2011, 13:25
Default
  #21
Senior Member
 
Holger Marschall
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 19
holger_marschall is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to holger_marschall
Hi Sylvester,
Hi David,

I am the administrator of the Extend Community Portal.

You are indeed making a valid point. However, my view is a bit more differentiated: It is my strong belief that development must be as transparent as possible AND that freedom must be provided to developers to the greatest extend possible. The ultimate goal of providing infrastructure (a content management system in this case: forum, project management, etc.) for the project is to stimulate developments. This **must** be provided both free (of costs) and free (in the sense of freedom).

This said, there are surely many possibilities to approach this goal. The Extend Community Portal provides some; the members are free to choose among different options:
  1. Groups
    There is the option to create Special Interest Groups, Local User Groups and Working Groups. The third 'type', a working group would be about working on a specific issue using OpenFOAM technology. A group forum (that is automatically created) is open and transparent. All forums are searchable.
  2. Project
    This is additional functionality providing the possbility to manage a project (file sharing, task and time management, etc.). A project can be created as closed or open project. Eventually that is up to the founder.

Sylvester, I think, it's really fair to say that with code being in a very early stage (definitely far from a release), people should be allowed to organize their work on their code using free and open accessible infrastructure as provided by Extend. If this is organised around open or closed projects is up to the users and would happen anyway. I would surely like to see that developers **always** create a 'working group' when starting a project on the portal, where they announce that they have started to work on a specific topic, so people can ask questions or ask how to join. Then, the next step would be to do a wall post on the corresponding SIG site being close to the working area. In the past, one would not even been aware of anything going on, because people are sharing e-mails . So the portal is putting together many functions to get informations organized **at place** and to provide the possibility to contact the members of a group that are currently active in the respective field.

David, thanks for your input. You are completely right. The CMS this site is build around is a modular one (diffent layout per functionality). One surely must take some time to get into it and I do appreciate any **concrete** hint how to improve structure. For this, please report your suggestions to the bug report system (Mantis) of Extend. It's like the documentation... let's improve it in a collaborative manner!

best regards,
Holger
__________________
Holger Marschall
web: http://www.holger-marschall.info
mail: holgermarschall@yahoo.de
holger_marschall is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion nakul OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 19 February 27, 2024 09:44
[Other] A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion nakul OpenFOAM Community Contributions 20 February 22, 2019 09:08
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error Peter_600 OpenFOAM 4 August 2, 2014 09:52
Development of a Low mach PISO solver nishant_hull OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 August 25, 2009 12:48
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? bearcat CFX 6 April 28, 2008 14:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:59.