CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/)
-   -   Turbulent heat flux through the wall (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam/96512-turbulent-heat-flux-through-wall.html)

feldy77 January 24, 2012 21:32

Turbulent heat flux through the wall
 
Dear forum,
I am really confused about how I should compute heat flux through the static boundary in the presence of turbulent incompressible flow if I use the basic k-e model. According to the heat transfer theory
Q''=(k_lam+k_turb)(dT/dn), where k_lam is a some constant value of a certain fluid and k_turb=cp*miu_t/Pr_t. It looks like everything is clear : cp is known, the commonly used value of Pr_t is 0.85, miu_t is calculated from k-e model. The twist is that the boundary value of miu_t (niu_t for incompressible flow) is set to zero (I am talking about buouantBoussinesqPimpleFoam tutorial for hotRoom). The same is done for the boundary value of miu_t in Fluent. Then it is completely unclear what is the difference between calculating of heat flux for laminar and turbulent flows.
I will be very grateful if somebody clarifies this issue,
many thanks, Yuri

feldy77 January 25, 2012 14:34

please anybody can say his opinion,
I really need your help

kaifu January 25, 2012 18:50

k_turb
Quote:

Originally Posted by feldy77 (Post 340981)
Dear forum,
I am really confused about how I should compute heat flux through the static boundary in the presence of turbulent incompressible flow if I use the basic k-e model. According to the heat transfer theory
Q''=(k_lam+k_turb)(dT/dn), where k_lam is a some constant value of a certain fluid and k_turb=cp*miu_t/Pr_t. It looks like everything is clear : cp is known, the commonly used value of Pr_t is 0.85, miu_t is calculated from k-e model. The twist is that the boundary value of miu_t (niu_t for incompressible flow) is set to zero (I am talking about buouantBoussinesqPimpleFoam tutorial for hotRoom). The same is done for the boundary value of miu_t in Fluent. Then it is completely unclear what is the difference between calculating of heat flux for laminar and turbulent flows.
I will be very grateful if somebody clarifies this issue,
many thanks, Yuri

I dont see any problems inside. As you said, Q''=(k_lam+k_turb)(dT/dn). if k_turb=0 then Q''=k_lam dT/dn.

And the temperature
relies on the turbulent model you included although you will have the same gradient at the wall. I am sure temperature in the bulk is totally different between laminar and turbulent flows due to the different heat transfer coeff in the bulk.

feldy77 January 25, 2012 19:04

Kai,
Thank you for your reply. Maybe you can explain me then, why the openFoam utility wallHeatTransfer utilizes alafaeff whcich consists of turbulent amd laminar components and not jus uses the laminar component only
Many thanks, yuri

kaifu January 25, 2012 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by feldy77 (Post 341190)
Kai,
Thank you for your reply. Maybe you can explain me then, why the openFoam utility wallHeatTransfer utilizes alafaeff whcich consists of turbulent amd laminar components and not jus uses the laminar component only
Many thanks, yuri

It is all dependent on the expectation you have. The wall viscosity should be modelled actually. I can only say that the treatment of zero wall viscosity is rather crude. If you would like to model wall viscosity, plz refer to the file "wallViscosity.H" in the solver of bubbleFoam.

Goutam March 6, 2012 08:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by feldy77 (Post 340981)
Dear forum,
I am really confused about how I should compute heat flux through the static boundary in the presence of turbulent incompressible flow if I use the basic k-e model. According to the heat transfer theory
Q''=(k_lam+k_turb)(dT/dn), where k_lam is a some constant value of a certain fluid and k_turb=cp*miu_t/Pr_t. It looks like everything is clear : cp is known, the commonly used value of Pr_t is 0.85, miu_t is calculated from k-e model. The twist is that the boundary value of miu_t (niu_t for incompressible flow) is set to zero (I am talking about buouantBoussinesqPimpleFoam tutorial for hotRoom). The same is done for the boundary value of miu_t in Fluent. Then it is completely unclear what is the difference between calculating of heat flux for laminar and turbulent flows.
I will be very grateful if somebody clarifies this issue,
many thanks, Yuri

Dear Yuri, did you able to solve this problem? I am facing same problem.
Looking forward to see your reply.

niaz March 6, 2012 14:33

Dear Foamers
for k-epsilon model, you must use wall-function for nut.
and without it, the solution is not acceptable.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:29.