|
[Sponsors] |
[General] How so suppress update of steady objects for new time steps |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 22, 2014, 11:36 |
How so suppress update of steady objects for new time steps
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
I have an issue with PV that bothers me every time I want to view or save an animation of particles together with some representation of the underlying flow field.
As long as I only have the particles visible, the animation runs quite fast, lets say in the range of 10ms per timestep. fast.jpg The problem is that if I want to show some representation of the flow field in the background like e.g. streamlines, it takes orders of magnitude longer. awfully_slow.jpg It seems like the streamlines were recomputed every time step, which is not necessary. I have a steady-state flow field and only the particle positions change. I thought that the option "Ignore time" would be what I am searching for, but it has no effect. I ticked "Ignore time" for every object except the particles, but this changes nothing. My workaround until now was to save an image of the flow representation I need and use it instead of the actual results, but that is not very comfortable. I have version 4.01 installed right now, but this issue has been bothering me since 3.10. Any ideas? |
|
January 24, 2014, 19:22 |
|
#2 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings Alex,
So, if I understand you correctly, the "LB_results" data remains the same for all time snapshots, is that correct? But whenever you change the file, it seems to reload and recalculate the streamlines. There are 2 possibilities here:
Bruno |
|
January 27, 2014, 04:13 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
Thanks Bruno, your advice helped a lot.
The "Lock Interactive Render" feature was already turned off, so this did not cause the problem. Both options you supposed in 2. worked for me, although only the "extract surface" filter retained the information of the streamlines. In order to help me fully understand what I am doing wrong, could you try comment on these issues: The data inside "LB_results" that contains the flow field actually changes with time. But only because we use a transient solver to obtain a steady-state result. There is only a small amount of time steps and I only want to use the last one. The particle trajectories were actually calculated based on the last "time step" of the "LB_results" dataset. So here is the thing: "LB_results" only contains 4 time steps, of which only the last one is needed. The "Particles.vtk" contains thousands of real time steps showing the actual trajectories of the particles. So although the time counter in ParaView is constantly higher than the last time step available in "LB_results" during the animation, PV still tries to update the representations based on this dataset? Then what is the "ignore time" option good for? |
|
February 2, 2014, 12:11 |
|
#4 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Alex,
The "ignore time" option only affects the selected source entry in pipeline; it will be certainly frozen in time, although most likely it will be stuck in the first iteration. But the streamlines are always calculated when a new time snapshot occurs. Here's how I know this... I've done a few tests with OpenFOAM data in ParaView 3.12.0 and I noticed the following:
Note: I have not tested with ParaView 4.1.0, to see if the same problem still occurs or not. Best regards, Bruno |
|
February 3, 2014, 02:03 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46 |
Thanks for your effort.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Elastic or Plastic Deformations in OpenFOAM | NickolasPl | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 36 | September 23, 2023 08:22 |
[Other] Contribution a new utility: refine wall layer mesh based on yPlus field | lakeat | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 58 | December 23, 2021 02:36 |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 04:13 |
pimpleDyMFoam computation randomly stops | babapeti | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | January 24, 2018 05:28 |
Star cd es-ice solver error | ernarasimman | STAR-CD | 2 | September 12, 2014 00:01 |