CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ParaView

Paraview

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 16, 2007, 12:14
Default Paraview
  #1
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Does anyone have experience with Paraview in comparison with Tecplot?

Is it easy to convert between the file formats of Tecplot and Paraview?

Is Paraview as userfriendly as Tecplot once you know how to work with it?

Or in one question, is it worthwile to change from Tecplot to paraview because it's for free?

Comments are welcome!

Jim
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2007, 16:28
Default Re: Paraview
  #2
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
>Is it easy to convert between the file formats of Tecplot and Paraview?

based on my knowledge, no.

>Is Paraview as userfriendly as Tecplot once you know how to work with it?

no

tecplot is more userfriendly and particularly faster (v. 10 is very fast and uses state-of-theart vis. tech.), but paraveiw has its benefits, is more costomizable and extendable plus parallel capability. For a formal post processing i don't see reason for switching from Tecplot to parav.

If you look for a free post processor, GID is an alternative (free for academic use). Particularly, it could read Tecplot ASCII format (it is pre and post processor, but is not as user friendly as Tecplot is)
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2007, 14:11
Default Re: Paraview
  #3
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, to be honest it's for commercial use, I didn't figure out yet what the price of Tecplot is, it's for a very small company that's why I asked for some free stuff at first.

I've been working with Tecplot in other (much bigger) companies before and liked it a lot, that's why I asked whether there exists a freeware tool that is as user friendly.

I'll try to convice my boss to find out the price and buy Tecplot, because it seems that Paraview may be hard to learn

Thanks for your answer rt,

Jim
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2007, 14:58
Default Re: Paraview
  #4
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
> Paraview may be hard to learn

note that paraview is not hard to learn, i already work with paraveiw it is nice, but at comparison position, without attantion to cost, i select tecplot for formal CFD usage.

An other powerful commercial post-processor is Ensight
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2007, 15:19
Default Re: Paraview
  #5
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Didn't know about Ensight, thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2007, 07:09
Default Re: Paraview
  #6
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
By the way,

Is it actually allowed to use Paraview for commercial purposes?

The programs seems so good to me to be true for being fully free.

Regards,

Jim.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2007, 10:45
Default Re: Paraview
  #7
Praveen. C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Paraview is indeed a powerful tool. It is built on vtk which makes it very versatile. If you know some vtk, you can extend its power by writing your own programs in C/Java/python.

According to their website, I dont see any restrictions on commercial use

http://paraview.org/New/copyright.html
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2007, 15:44
Default Re: Paraview
  #8
marcio
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been working with paraview for about a year, and it's not as difficult to learn as it may looks at first sight. Tecplot is more user-friendly for the new user, but you won't take 2 months to learn paraview.

Paraview may be slow, mainly if your data is not in a binary format. However, its pipeline structure is very useful, and allows you to apply a sequence of filters - operations - on your data, then go back at any point of this sequence and modify some parameters, and the change will propagate automatically to the end of the pipeline.

I worked with tecplot also, and I think paraview is at least worth a try. The only costs you'll have will be the manuals, which are not free, but surely cost much less than a tecplot license.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2007, 10:57
Default Re: Paraview
  #9
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you, I already started with ParaView in the mean time and eh... it's not bad at all, I slowly starting to like it!
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2007, 08:27
Default Re: Paraview
  #10
FozzyBear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've used both, been using Paraview for 6 months, currently using Paraview 3 cvs, use of qt gui library makes for nice experience. Its a comparable program. Its free. Its a no brainer really. Use Paraview.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2007, 09:46
Default Re: Paraview
  #11
Jim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you, I indeed chose Paraview!
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paraview nice animation PyGloo ParaView 4 June 7, 2012 13:34
Newbie: Install ParaView 3.81 on OF-1.6-ext/OpenSuse 11.2? lentschi OpenFOAM Installation 1 March 9, 2011 03:32
Paraview not found fusij OpenFOAM Installation 2 January 1, 2011 21:44
Distributed ParaView and PV3FoamReader micalil OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 4 July 1, 2010 06:09
paraFoam reader for OpenFOAM 1.6 smart OpenFOAM Installation 13 November 16, 2009 22:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51.