CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Phoenics

Drag Coefficient Calculation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 29, 2012, 04:50
Default Drag Coefficient Calculation
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
antonusklesk is on a distinguished road
This is a very basic question, but it's puzzling me at the moment and I'm hoping someone might be able to shed light on it for me, it's probably very obvious I just can't see it!

I'm running some simulations in Phoenics on ground vehicles and retrieving drag and CD values for comparison purposes.

The values I retrieve for CDx are very close to what I would expect of the simulation, however the Phoenics calculation uses the dimensional length to calculate each CD axis:

Cd = Force /(Dynamic head * Normalisation area)

Whereas typically it would be frontal area rather than length in the x-direction that would be used to calculate the CD.

What confuses me is that the CDx values output by Phoenics are always extremely close to what I'd expect from the simulation, but if I calculate the CD using force values and frontal area rather than length along the axis, the CD value is much larger than it should be and consequently the Force values calculated must be larger than they should be?

To give an example:
_______________________________________________
Integrated forces for all included objects
------------------------------------------
Fx = 2.778401E+03
Fy = -4.078467E+02
Fz = 8.727589E+01
Ftot= 2.809532E+03

Normalisation areas:
AREAx = 1.650000E+01
AREAy = 4.000000E+00
AREAz = 3.165000E+00

Reference density = 1.189000E+00, Reference velocity = 2.500000E+01
Free-stream dynamic head = 3.715625E+02

Drag coefficients based on total forces:
(Cd = Force /(Dynamic head * Normalisation area)
Cdx = 4.531888E-01
Cdy = 2.744133E-01
Cdz = 7.421450E-02
__________________________________________________ _

Phoenics gives a CDx of .45 which is the CD result I'd expect from this case, however if I calculate it myself from the frontal area the CD is around .67.

Any insight and re-aligning in the right direction is much appreciated.
antonusklesk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2012, 05:07
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
antonusklesk is on a distinguished road
Ah I believe I've noticed my mistake:

In the reference areaX, Y, Z in the CD calulation settings I've placed the object size on that axis not it's area.

So to fix this I'd put the frontal area in the 'Reference Area in X' section.

However this means that the force in N calculated by my setup is far too large and giving incorrect values.

Are my assumptions correct?
antonusklesk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculation of Drag Coefficient manually PRASHANT GHADGE FLUENT 4 December 13, 2012 16:31
Calculation of Drag Coefficient, Help Please teek22 CFX 1 April 26, 2012 18:41
Problem with drag coefficient calculation Crystal Main CFD Forum 0 June 12, 2009 14:14
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
Warning 097- AB CD-adapco 6 November 15, 2004 05:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58.