CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Phoenics

turbulence covergence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 19, 2002, 04:43
Default turbulence covergence
Posts: n/a

After getting the solution, I am facing a difficulty in judging that the particular set of input turbulence parameters (example; Dissipation length scale & Turbulence intensity in standard K E modal), being selected are correct. For this, should I check the residuals of turbulence only or do I need to check something else.

I will appreciate your guidance in this regard

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 19, 2002, 20:47
Default Re: turbulence covergence
JinHyo, Bae
Posts: n/a
If you have an experimental data for the case, you can adjust that value. If not, you can only use default value. How aout using RNG K-E model?

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sudden non covergence of k-e Anastasios FLUENT 2 January 27, 2008 08:06
turbulence:turbulence viscosity vs kinetic energy sam FLUENT 0 June 25, 2007 23:51
Turbulence%+Dh abel FLUENT 3 April 12, 2005 18:19
turbulence abdou Main CFD Forum 5 February 12, 2005 07:22
HELP! TURBULENCE k-e OR k-omega TURBULENCE MODEL? Mirek Kabacinski FLUENT 5 August 24, 2003 22:31

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:31.