
[Sponsors] 
May 30, 2003, 14:37 
About the pressure coefficients

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi all, For the pressure coefficients
Pressure Coefficient The mass flow through the opening is: M" = C * (Pext  Pint) when different values are used the CFD computation will definetely different,say,why not use 2 or 3 instead of 1 for the coefficients? if pressure BC is used for the outlets the mass flow rate is not known beforehand how do you determine this pressure coefficient?when 1 is used what happens then? does that mean the mass=1.0(PextPint) always? would somebody gives me some details about how to determine the coefficents for pressure boundary conditions? 

June 11, 2003, 10:33 
Re: About the pressure coefficients

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

if you go back, you may find several threads on this issue. I don't know how to choose the coeff. But one thing, this coefficient does not affect the mass flow rate. mass=co*(PextPint) is right. however, somehow, the mass is not determined this way. Mass has to follow the mass balance. so a small Co would cause a large PextPint, and vice verse.... You may not see big difference if you change co from 1 to 2. But you mignt see some difference of the airflow in the vincity of outlet if you change it to a large coefficient, see 100. Here is my way to choose this coefficient (hope someone can confirm): if the incell pressure is close to the outlet, use a large coefficient. If there is significant pressure difference, use a small one. I am doing simulation in ventilation. Normally a fan is installed to extract the air from the room. So I use a small coefficient (1.0) assuming there is some pressure difference in the outlet.
hope this helps Guoqing 

June 11, 2003, 10:34 
Re: About the pressure coefficients

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

if you go back, you may find several threads on this issue. I don't know how to choose the coeff. But one thing, this coefficient does not affect the mass flow rate. mass=co*(PextPint) is right. however, somehow, the mass is not determined this way. Mass has to follow the mass balance. so a small Co would cause a large PextPint, and vice verse.... You may not see big difference if you change co from 1 to 2. But you mignt see some difference of the airflow in the vincity of outlet if you change it to a large coefficient, say 100. Here is my way to choose this coefficient (hope someone can confirm): if the incell pressure is close to the outlet, use a large coefficient. If there is significant pressure difference, use a small one. I am doing simulation in ventilation. Normally a fan is installed to extract the air from the room. So I use a small coefficient (1.0) assuming there is some pressure difference in the outlet.
hope this helps Guoqing 

June 11, 2003, 16:15 
Re: About the pressure coefficients

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Yeah,Guoqing, I agree with you. Problem does happen when multi pressure outlets are involved. Then these coefficients are important which will dramatically determine the airflow in the domain.(natural ventilation etc.) When pressure is not the concern of the problem the coefficicient can be unimportant. Now I know the coefficients must be characterised based on the flow resistance of the opening,I was told nonlinear coefficients maybe needed then the pressure underelaxation may be large. hope I am right.Some more details are required. Phoenics supports,any more details? Thanks,


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Pressure coefficients  antonio_ing  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  8  August 8, 2012 07:22 
Specifying Wind Pressure Coefficients  NK  FLUENT  0  January 30, 2009 08:32 
Pressure coefficients  antonio_ing  OpenFOAM PostProcessing  1  December 29, 2008 23:01 
Problems with pressure coefficients  Khoa Kim  FLUENT  2  August 26, 2008 08:02 
rms of pressure coefficients  kbutler  FLUENT  0  August 27, 2007 17:20 