CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Pointwise & Gridgen

[Pointwise] Do we have an option to re-dimension all the connectors together?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2012, 06:21
Default [Pointwise] Do we have an option to re-dimension all the connectors together?
  #1
New Member
 
Mahak
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
m2205 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am very impressed with Pointwise overall and suggest this software to everybody. One thing that has quite troubled me is that I can not find an option to re-dimension all the connector together to be able to do mesh dependency study for a particular code. Say I have to half the number of cells - so I would like to multiply each connector dimension with ~ 0.8

Does anyone know about it(or some other way of doing this in Pointwise) around here?

Thanks
M
m2205 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2012, 18:13
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Nickul's Avatar
 
Nick
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England (South West)
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 8
Nickul is on a distinguished road
is it structured? , if so then up in the top menu, (I'm really struggling to remember this off the top of my head) in the Grid / Dimension menu, you can change the one connector ,and then PW rattles through and selects all the adjacent connectors and then changing the master changes all of them. (but that is just in the one direction (IJK)

But I'm sure you can select multiple connectors with Ctrl + select , and redimension them all together.....
__________________
A simple aero calculator
www.caided.co.uk
Nickul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2012, 18:31
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Mahak
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
m2205 is on a distinguished road
Hey Nickul,

Thanks for replying. Yes I can select all the connectors and dimension them but I am talking about giving it a factor..this way it gives same dimension to all the connectors.

For e.g. I would like 10x4 domain to become 20x8 domain...doing what you have suggested will give me 20x20 or 8x8 domain.

I cant see an option for that.


Thanks
M
m2205 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2012, 18:57
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Nickul's Avatar
 
Nick
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England (South West)
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 8
Nickul is on a distinguished road
oh I see, you want some kind of parameter functionality.

Time for a glyph perhaps? I've just had a quick scroll through, and there is not much on the PW website, but perhaps you could hack the myDistribution glyph around ?

"myDistribution
A sample of how you can write a connector grid point distribution function."
__________________
A simple aero calculator
www.caided.co.uk
Nickul is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2012, 19:32
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 7
sail is on a distinguished road
A glph or some journaling recording-modifications-replay can certantly do the trick.

Instead, given that sometimes i'm lazy, i do tend to dimension the connectors in function of the spacing, more than the number of points.

Of course this depend on the geometry.

If it is not too complex you can even hand pick the connectors that shows the same points on the menu on the left and redimension by hand in group

If you are even more lazy than that, most cfd sw that i know of can perform a local or general cell refinement (fluent, OF, CFX, not sure about starccm)
__________________
http://www.leadingedge.it/
Naval architecture and CFD consultancy
sail is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2012, 05:56
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Mahak
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
m2205 is on a distinguished road
Thanks guys...its time to do some gylph scripting then.

My geometry is complex...and I need to do mesh dependency studies..where you need to double up number of cells and reduce \Deltas proportionally.
m2205 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2012, 20:52
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 12
cnsidero is on a distinguished road
Yes, my suggestion would be to script this, particularly if you want to use non-integer refinement values.

If your mesh is structured, one tip I will give is to add some logic to the script to check for and fix unbalancing of domains and blocks. This might happen when you have an edge in domain defined by more than one connector. Because of rounding, when you refine an edge with a differing number of connectors than it's opposing edge, it may become unbalanced.

Another tip would be to be careful about connectors will the "general" distribution function. If a connector dist func is general, it won't update like the other distribution functions and you may not get the result you're looking for if you refine it. This is because general is not really a distribution function. A connector's dist func gets set to general when curvature-based refinement or the orthogonal BC in the elliptic solver is used.

Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any questions about how to go about doing this and/or Glyph scripting in general.

-Chris
cnsidero is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method Suzzn CFX 18 October 2, 2009 04:18
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:31.