Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 07:26
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:49
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:44
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:40
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:34
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:31
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 11, 2014, 06:17
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
March 10, 2014, 09:50
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 15, 2013, 05:21
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
I guess I did not illustrate my thoughts clear...
I guess I did not illustrate my thoughts clear enough:
You can run a simulation with LES turbulence model and a bad (too large) grid. Then, the level of modeling of the SGS model will be quite high....
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 15, 2013, 04:40
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 15, 2013, 04:08
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
Radial distribution ok, but that only helps for...
Radial distribution ok, but that only helps for types of flows where reference values are known. Comparing to DNS results or experiments does only mean you get the correct real results. That does not...
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 15, 2013, 03:49
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 07:44
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
So it's recommened to take the worst case...
So it's recommened to take the worst case (=smallest) time step to ensure that it is actually small enough. Ok, but if you double it afterwards and compare the results you can learn for future...
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 07:00
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
Sorry, but I still don't get your point. :o ...
Sorry, but I still don't get your point. :o
Now, there is some time scale needed for DNS. For LES the grid is coarser and the fastes eddies get modeled - so the required time step gets larger. The...
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 05:07
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:57
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:51
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:44
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
As I understand it, for a given grid, there...
As I understand it, for a given grid, there should be independence of LES statistics for small time step sizes. Thus, when I decrease my time step, hopefully results won't change... Right now I...
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:33
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:27
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 04:10
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
Dear Filippo, thanks for your fast reply.
With...
Dear Filippo, thanks for your fast reply.
With "kinetic energy" you mean the kinetic energy of the resolved scales, right? I have to do this with a custom field function "0.5 * v * v * rho"?
All...
|
Forum: Main CFD Forum
February 14, 2013, 03:22
|
Replies: 52
Views: 4,704
LES evaluation help needed
Dear all,
I try to get some experience in LES and need some help.
My setup is a simple straight pipe of 4m length and 1m diameter. Periodic bc with a mass flow rate of 0.044 kg/s is applied,...
|