CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums

Search Results

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Showing results 1 to 12 of 12
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: gschaider
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD March 21, 2011, 04:28
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
This may or may not (I have not time to check)...

This may or may not (I have not time to check) this bug:

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-bugs/79306-particle-class-uses-wallimpactdistance-non-wall-patches.html
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD March 11, 2011, 09:31
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
With such small particles the question is whether...

With such small particles the question is whether you need a lagrangian solver (because the particles will immidiately follow the flow)

Don't know about your concrete problem.

For output on...
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD December 22, 2010, 04:36
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
You can't have done much wrong (if you just added...

You can't have done much wrong (if you just added the Clouds). Which injection model do you use? Try varying that and try disabling 2 of the 3 clouds (by setting active to false in the...
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD December 21, 2010, 06:07
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Hi Nir! Some questions: - have you tried...

Hi Nir!

Some questions:
- have you tried running the regular coalChemistryFoam-solver in a similar configuration (just to rule out that the problem is with your modification)
- Which version of...
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD December 7, 2010, 14:05
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Hi Paul! icoLagrangianFoam should be in...

Hi Paul!

icoLagrangianFoam should be in 1.6-ext, but not in the solver directory but in $FOAM_TUTORIALS/lagrangian

Bernhard
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD October 27, 2010, 05:32
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
This seems to be a general problem with the...

This seems to be a general problem with the 1.5-dev (I'm getting it too). The nature of the stack-trace indicates that somewhere memory is freed twice somewhere

Bernhard
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD October 24, 2010, 06:47
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Hi Dan! Could you try the same with the...

Hi Dan!

Could you try the same with the rhoTurbTwinParcelFoam? Just to make sure whether the problem is with the solver or with the library?

Bernhard
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD June 1, 2010, 07:42
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Does this happen only in parallel runs? (I doubt...

Does this happen only in parallel runs? (I doubt it)

I think it IS physical: particles with a momentum appear out of nowhere (OK. THAT is unphysical). What should the fluid do? Suffer silently...
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD November 9, 2009, 16:45
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
There are two such methods. One is empty. The...

There are two such methods. One is empty. The other not.
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD November 9, 2009, 05:50
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Before we start talking: which version? (OpenFOAM...

Before we start talking: which version? (OpenFOAM and icoLagrangianFoam)

I just had a quick look at the latest version and noticed that in method HardBallParticle::hitProcessorPatch it reads...
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD August 24, 2009, 10:00
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
For small cases that is not surprising, because...

For small cases that is not surprising, because the communication needs more time than the actual calculation
Forum: OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD August 24, 2009, 07:58
Replies: 37
Views: 5,694
Posted By gschaider
Try again with mpriun -np 2 icoLagrangianFoam...

Try again with
mpriun -np 2 icoLagrangianFoam -parallel
(what you did was run two serial runs in parallel

Bernhard
Showing results 1 to 12 of 12

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:44.