CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Turbulence models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 19, 2012, 08:36
Default Turbulence models
  #1
New Member
 
Breivik
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Breivik is on a distinguished road
Hi
I'm doing a full scale, calm water simulation of a ship with a free surface. In this case I wolud like to know which of turbulence model, K-epsilon or k-omega, that are best suited to use?
The domain is quite large, with the free surface having a span of 650 x 430 meters.

Any answer would be much appreciated

Breivik
Breivik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 20, 2012, 01:39
Default
  #2
Member
 
sanjay's Avatar
 
aerosapien
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 6
sanjay is on a distinguished road
i HAD USED K-EPSILON FOR SIMULATING TUNNEL HULL. RESULTS ARE A QUITE GOOD


best regards
www.aerosapien.blogspot.com
sanjay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2012, 06:54
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
siara817's Avatar
 
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 9
siara817 is on a distinguished road
I think it can be different for every case. It is nice to search for a literature source to find out which one is proper. Otherwise you need to simulate a simple case similar to your case. Then check the some properties to see if they are realistic. You can use for example streamline and check if the behavior of your fluid is realistic.
Good luck
siara817 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2012, 09:21
Default
  #4
Member
 
sanjay's Avatar
 
aerosapien
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 6
sanjay is on a distinguished road
siara817 what u said is very much right


best regards
www.aerosapien.blogspot.com
sanjay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2012, 03:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Breivik
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Breivik is on a distinguished road
Actually I have done the simulation with both models, and as far as I can see the water behaviour is quite similar in both cases.
The thing is: The drag coefficient differs slightly (5 - 6 %) after som 30 000 iterations.

So my question still stands
Does anyone here know which of the models that are best suited for a full scale, calm water and implicit unsteady case(the ship has 0 DOF)?
As mentioned before the domain is quite large.
Breivik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2012, 11:54
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 12
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Are you sure, all other errors except the turbulence model are small enough? To be able to judge about 5% difference due to the turbulence model, you have to make sure, all other errors are significantly smaller.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here:
GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP
You may choose any two!
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 August 4, 2010 10:26
different zones, different turbulence models gmwsy FLUENT 3 June 19, 2009 06:08
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Tutorial 21: Turbulence models spatialtime CFX 4 April 24, 2009 05:25
Turbulence models for GCV method dosen't work! Sima Baheri Phoenics 0 January 6, 2007 05:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36.