CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Mesh for calculating heat transfer in solid/fluid

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 7, 2012, 11:07
Default
  #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 6
tH3f0rC3 is on a distinguished road
Could you please post a screenshot from the cut in the x-y-plane without other cuts shown so that the temperature scale is set to max and mix temperature of this cut?

Thank you!
Or can you send the .sim file to me? (tH3f0rC3@web.de)

Last edited by tH3f0rC3; June 7, 2012 at 15:31.
tH3f0rC3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2012, 04:11
Default
  #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 12
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Dude, there is no issue with the pattern itself. Without the other sections it looks like the attached picture. Sure, there is the chessboard pattern. But this is just the usual behaviour. It will get better when you refine the mesh, but you will NEVER completely get around it. The trick is to create the smallest mesh giving you results you can live with.

And I'm in a good mood, so I will give you a detailed explanation why this is fact:

There is only temperature value for every cell. That's the value calculated for the cell center, depending on (in this case) the Z-coordinate.
Next there are about 20 more or less evenly sized cells over the solid thickness in my mesh (without the prism layers). And there is a temperature difference of about 70K (without the prism layers). So the temperature difference from one cell to the next in Z-direction is about 3K.
Now the plane section cuts one cell where the cell center is above the section coordinate and next it cuts a cell where the cell center is below the section coordinate. So you will have two different temperature values, although the section is on the same coordinate and you expect the exactly same temperature.
You can achieve this expectation. You just need to create an infinite fine mesh. In reality, this is neither possible nor economic. So why bother about the chessboard pattern when the heat flux, temperature monitors etc. don't change anymore when you refine the mesh and the errors are small enough?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Img1.jpg (57.4 KB, 14 views)
tH3f0rC3 likes this.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here:
GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP
You may choose any two!
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2012, 04:44
Default
  #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 6
tH3f0rC3 is on a distinguished road
I thought there might be another option I haven't thought of.

I wasn't sure wether to interpret the chessboard pattern as an error in calculation/mesh-size or as a result of the high temperature difference. Now it is clear thanks to your good explanation.

Thanks for your help!

Best Regards,
tH3f0rC3
tH3f0rC3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quenching simulation : how to set up a conjugate heat transfer between solid&liquid Rockda FLUENT 23 March 15, 2015 00:19
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff swahono OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 February 26, 2015 05:30
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 November 25, 2012 09:54
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50.