CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

matching pressure drop with test set up

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 13, 2012, 23:43
Default matching pressure drop with test set up
  #1
Member
 
adam
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 5
sieginc. is on a distinguished road
I'm running a simulation that has a lower pressure drop than what I'm reading from a similar experimental test set up. In the test set up, there is a fan at the inlet whereas in the simulation the inlet is just velocity with uniform flow. I'm guessing the higher losses in the experiment are due to fan swirl, because all the dimensions between the two are exact. How do I account for the extra DP in the experimental set up caused by the fan? I have tried messing with the turbulence intensity and other settings but that had zero influence.
sieginc. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2012, 05:01
Default
  #2
azt
Member
 
allan thomson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: scotland
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 8
azt is on a distinguished road
Hi

You can use a porous region close to the exit of the domain and successively reduce the pososity until you get the desired pressure drop between the inlet and outlet.
allan
azt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2012, 20:13
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 12
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
It's also a matter of how much your simulation results differ from the experimental ones. Many people either overestimate the accuracy of simulations or underestimate the effort needed to produce "exact" results.

Also, don't bother too much with comparing experimental results with simulation results unless you REALLY know what's going on in the experiment. I've seen too many people bothering about the difference between simulation and experiment - but they didn't even know the limitations of the experiment and how big the experimental error was (and believe me, experiments can be as wrong as simulations).

Nobody trusts a simulation - except the guy who did it.
Everybody trusts an experiment - except the guy who did it.

Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean your simulation is right - just try to simulate exactly what you've been measuring.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here:
GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP
You may choose any two!
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] ICEM Scripting Issues tylerplowright ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 17 June 3, 2012 21:23
critical error during installation of openfoam Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01
pressure drop jay Main CFD Forum 1 September 24, 2008 09:27
How to set environment variables kanishka OpenFOAM Installation 1 September 4, 2005 10:15
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) HB &DS CFX 0 January 9, 2000 14:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09.