CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Problem with simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 18, 2012, 07:55
Default Problem with simulation
New Member
Eleanor V
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
bean is on a distinguished road
I am trying to simulate the effect of having a microperforation, similar to that which you would use for laminar flow control.

I have refined the mesh for the hole, and the area around the boundary layer.

I have used the following models: Ideal Gas, K-epsilon Turbulence, Realizable K-epsilon Two-layer, RANS, Segregated flow, segregated fluid temperature, steady, 3D, turbulent and 2 layer all y+ wall treatment.

It is running incredibly slowly, so I tried changing it from segregated to coupled to see if that changed anything. Then this crashed, giving me a "floating point exception" error. It seems to me that currently this is a fairly simple simulation. I havent even put conditions on to make suction occur yet.

I am getting huge recirculations within the flow, as you can see from my attached picture.

Any glaringly obvious mistakes?

Thank you for your help
Attached Images
File Type: png ModGeom1_Vector Scene 1.png (32.8 KB, 31 views)
bean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 24, 2012, 00:05
Senior Member
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 766
Rep Power: 13
LuckyTran will become famous soon enough
Switching to the coupled solver isn't going to make anything better (it's more unstable than the segregated solver and takes longer to solve).

Whenever you use ideal gas, temperature is usually the culprit. The solver is solving for the fluid temperature which affects the density and messes a lot of things up. It is better if you can remove this dependency. I always recommend using constant density instead of ideal gas. Do you even need to use the ideal gas model? Is the incompressible (constant density) gas more appropriate?

Regardless of whether you are using ideal gas / constant density the energy equation takes a long time to solve! I always try to freeze the energy solver whenever possible because of how long it takes.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 25, 2012, 12:33
Senior Member
siara817's Avatar
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 9
siara817 is on a distinguished road
Do you know how many mesh cells do you have?
It may be because of the high number of mesh cells. In addition, it depends on your computer. How many processors do you use?
Good luck
siara817 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2012, 12:06
New Member
Eleanor V
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
bean is on a distinguished road

Thanks for your replies. Yeah I think it is just to do with the amount of mesh cells. I have approximately a million.

LuckyTran, you mentioned you try and freeze the energy solver. What do you mean by this please?
bean is offline   Reply With Quote


hlfc, microperforations, slow simulation

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with torque output from a turbine simulation. pa-dundas FLUENT 3 August 30, 2011 12:25
Transient simulation (Problem with massflow and Pressure) ChristianF CFX 4 August 22, 2011 21:42
about valve closing problem during ANSYS FSI simulation ivy CFX 4 June 8, 2011 21:01
Large-scale simulation problem Purushothama Main CFD Forum 0 November 7, 2010 21:12
Problem restarting a simulation from an intermediate point. sergiorbrett CFX 2 April 21, 2010 17:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:07.