McKOG 
November 7, 2014 09:59 
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwana
(Post 517907)
I was told by the technical support of IDAJ that the starccm is not designed for the supercritical fluid, and it can not deal with the drastically changed physical properties of supercritical fluid. However, in the region far away from the pseudocritical point where the physical properties do not change rapidly, the calculated results (heat transfer coefficient) meet the emprical formula, such as DB and Watts, well.
I suggest you use fluent or cfx to deal with the problem of supercritical fluid, just like what I am doing now.

Thanks for your reply! Well, I found one example from your previous post, and I followed your example and I got the good result. However, I have not checked the result with the empirical formulas. If they share a huge gap, I think I will choose Fluent.
Besides, there is a problem within your simulation that the thermodynamic property input is quite complex. Because you chose the polynomial density input, but I do not how to generate the polynomial density curves for my case. Can you show me how to do that?
By the way, from your name, are you Chinese?
