|March 12, 2013, 06:35||
Wall function mesh vs y+=1 mesh gives similar results
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6Rep Power: 5
I've been doing some 3D simulations in Star-ccm+ of external flow around an aerofoil style shape. I originally used a boundary layer mesh with a wall y+~1, but was curious to try a wall model style mesh. So I increased the wall y+, and it's now in a range of 10-40 .
The flow is modelled as steady and incompressible, with a Re=2E6. The turbulence model is Realizable K-Epsilon and I use the all y+ two-layer model for the boundary layer in both cases.
So I have two questions regarding these simulations:
1. The two different boundary layer mesh approaches give very similar answers, despite large areas of separation. Should I be worried by this?
2. The residuals converge nicely for a large number of iterations, but then start to oscillate. This happens even though the lift and drag forces have levelled out. I have a feeling that the residual behaviour is because the flow is actually unsteady, especially given the large degree of separation. Does this seem a fair assumption? The drag force does show very slow, low magnitude oscillation around a fixed value.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on either of the above, as I don't have a lot of experience of RANS. Thanks.
|boundary layer mesh, external flow, separated flow, star-ccm+, wall functions|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|No layers in a small gap||bobburnquist||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||6||August 26, 2015 09:38|
|Radiation interface||hinca||CFX||15||January 26, 2014 18:11|
|Layers:problem with curvature||giulio.topazio||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||10||August 22, 2012 09:03|
|[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent||romekr||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||1||November 26, 2011 13:11|
|channelFoam for a 3D pipe||AlmostSurelyRob||OpenFOAM||3||June 24, 2011 13:06|