CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Prism Layer (Boundary Layer) Thickness

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 27, 2013, 09:55
Default Prism Layer (Boundary Layer) Thickness
  #1
New Member
 
Peter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Peter-27 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
i'm using the Star-CCM+ software to model a vehicle and a little confused about the prism layer thickness.

I know that the prism layer is to model the boundary layer, but the equation for boundary layer contains the Reynolds number. The Reynolds number changes at each point along the length of the car which will mean that the boundary layer will change.

Therefore, what should my prism layer thickness be as prism layer thickness can't change along the length of the car ..

Thanks in advance,
Peter.
Peter-27 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2013, 15:32
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Ryne Whitehill
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 10
rwryne is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter-27 View Post
Hi,
i'm using the Star-CCM+ software to model a vehicle and a little confused about the prism layer thickness.

I know that the prism layer is to model the boundary layer, but the equation for boundary layer contains the Reynolds number. The Reynolds number changes at each point along the length of the car which will mean that the boundary layer will change.

Therefore, what should my prism layer thickness be as prism layer thickness can't change along the length of the car ..

Thanks in advance,
Peter.

Calculate boundary layer for the end of the vehicle, set prism layet to capture that.

i.e. if you were doing a flat plate 1 m long, you would use "1 m" in your boundary layer calculation. Overkill upfront, but it ensures you capture it all.
rwryne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 6, 2013, 13:37
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: India
Posts: 103
Rep Power: 4
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hey Peter

I am also very new to Star CCM+ and this question has perplexed me too.. Even I am trying to figure out the logic behind the first prism layer thickness value, however the default values are 33 % of the base value. If your flow is laminar or highly viscous in the region of interest, you can reduce the value to 20% or even lower and use the all y+ wall treatment model with fine mesh around the region of interest. This model blends the viscous and turbulent profiles smoothly.

The finer mesh in the region of interest can be obtained by accessing the following in Star CCM+ Region of interest(Wall Type Boundary)> Mesh Conditions>Custom Boundary Growth Rate> Slow, Medium, Fast options are available you can choose among them depending upon your flow.

I hope this was useful
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 18, 2013, 06:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Alamaas
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8
Alamaas is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone!

If my prism layer has 10 cells (for example) and the overall thickness of the prim layer is equal to the boundary layer thickness, do i still need to worry about y+ wall treatment or is it automatically taken care of?

Thank you!
Alamaas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2015, 12:49
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Yuanchuan Liu
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4
SailorLiu is on a distinguished road
Hi Alamaas, I know it has been a while since you posted. But I recently have an exact problem as yours. Have you finally figured it out?
As far as I am concerned, there are two parameters defining the boundary: the overall boundary layer thickness and the distance between the first cell and the wall. I read from elsewhere that there should be at least 10 cells inside the boundary layer while in order to use wall functions, you also need to make sure y+ should lie between 30 and 300. Besides, the growth rate should be best set as 1.2-1.25. There are just so many variables to consider. And I doubt all of them can be satisfied at the same time. BTW how do you determine the boundary layer thickness when you generate mesh? Do you use the Blasius solution for flat plates? Cheers,

Best wishes,

Yuanchuan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alamaas View Post
Hi everyone!

If my prism layer has 10 cells (for example) and the overall thickness of the prim layer is equal to the boundary layer thickness, do i still need to worry about y+ wall treatment or is it automatically taken care of?

Thank you!
SailorLiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2015, 03:55
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 2
KateEisenhower is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SailorLiu View Post
Hi Alamaas, I know it has been a while since you posted. But I recently have an exact problem as yours. Have you finally figured it out?
As far as I am concerned, there are two parameters defining the boundary: the overall boundary layer thickness and the distance between the first cell and the wall. I read from elsewhere that there should be at least 10 cells inside the boundary layer while in order to use wall functions, you also need to make sure y+ should lie between 30 and 300. Besides, the growth rate should be best set as 1.2-1.25. There are just so many variables to consider. And I doubt all of them can be satisfied at the same time. BTW how do you determine the boundary layer thickness when you generate mesh? Do you use the Blasius solution for flat plates? Cheers,

Best wishes,

Yuanchuan
Hi Yuanchuan,

I am just answering to your last question now. Generally, I would use the Blasius solution for laminar flow and the Prandtl solution for a turbulent boundary layer.
Regarding your other question, I have to do some research first. You should at least take into account your choice of turbulence model and whether you are using wall functions or not.

Have a nice day,

Kate

Last edited by KateEisenhower; May 6, 2015 at 04:03. Reason: addition
KateEisenhower is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2015, 13:01
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Nils Hennig
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 2
Fiedde1887 is on a distinguished road
Hi, iīm also working at my boundary layer. My scenario is a propeller at open-water conditions. I try to set a boundary-layer which is scientific correct. I used the Prandtl-formula and calculated the over-all thickness of the layer. After that i calculated the closest cell to the wall.
The results gave me an over-all thickness of 2.1mm and a cloesest cell of 0.00456mm for a y+=1. If the closest cell is larger than 0.01mm the solution converge, but if itīs smaler it doesnīt.
Does anyone have a hint for my problem?

Thank you in advance
Nils
Fiedde1887 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2015, 09:59
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Nils Hennig
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 2
Fiedde1887 is on a distinguished road
I solved my problem. I used the Distribution Mode: "Wall Thickness" and the "Hyperbolic Tangent" Stretching Funktion. If the mesh is still bad, i can use "Cell Quality Remediation"...it works fine
Fiedde1887 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
Prism layer needed to resolve laminar boundary (lowRe) M10 STAR-CCM+ 4 June 15, 2012 16:21
Boundary Layer roughness/ low reynolds wall treatment Luigi_ STAR-CCM+ 1 March 14, 2012 09:40
Boundary layer generation problems ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 6, 2010 13:47
Boundary layer thickness ghazanfarzahedi Main CFD Forum 2 July 28, 2009 23:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13.