CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Convergence/residuals with different turbulence models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 23, 2013, 13:32
Default Convergence/residuals with different turbulence models
  #1
New Member
 
MMatt
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 4
MMatt is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I have an external aerodynamics case which I am simulating. However I am unsure which model to use. First, my mesh is solid, I have at least 95% of the cells being of perfect quality and all the regions have skewness angles lower than 85.

Using an all y+ wall treatment, I had a look at the scalar scene to see that most of the surface is between 0 and 30, while the maximum that I have is below 200. Is that enough to say that the y+ assessment of the model is correct?

Secondly, the residuals that I have are relatively high (and I have other simulations with even higher ones) with quite a lot of oscillations as you can see below:



Is that acceptable? I am using a k-e model, explicit steady, segregated flow, but I am unsure if I am doing things right. If I need to provide more explanation please let me know.

Thanks for your help!
MMatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 14:46
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Paul Hancock
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 8
Paulh is on a distinguished road
If you're using a Low Reynolds number wall model, you should probably keep your Y+ between 0.5 & 2.5. If you're using a High Reynolds number wall model, 30 to 200. The all Y+ model give you the most flexibility, but I'd stay away from values between 2.5 & 30. Info from CD-adapco.

For my external aero models, I create reports & monitors for vehicle Cd and 'wind tunnel' Inlet pressure. These are what I use to judge convergence. You might also look at the max velocity in the model - that also needs to settle down.
Paulh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 04:49
Default
  #3
New Member
 
MMatt
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 4
MMatt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulh View Post
If you're using a Low Reynolds number wall model, you should probably keep your Y+ between 0.5 & 2.5. If you're using a High Reynolds number wall model, 30 to 200. The all Y+ model give you the most flexibility, but I'd stay away from values between 2.5 & 30. Info from CD-adapco.

For my external aero models, I create reports & monitors for vehicle Cd and 'wind tunnel' Inlet pressure. These are what I use to judge convergence. You might also look at the max velocity in the model - that also needs to settle down.
Thank you for your answer!

My Reynolds number is about 1.3E7 so a high one but I am using an all y+ treatment. Ironically most of my values are between 2.5 and 30. Using 5 layers for the BL could change the y+ value?

CD is also what I am using for convergence, but never heard of the inlet pressure, on what do you base this? Your personal experience or do you have documentation? Finally to assess this pressure, are you using a "maximum" report on the inlet and plotting the pressure (sorry for the dumb question)? If so then the pressure varies only between 40 and 120Pa.

Cheers
MMatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2013, 02:34
Default
  #4
Member
 
EMAVI V SURYA SAMPATH
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 5
sampathevs is on a distinguished road
Hello,

For external aerodynamics, prefer using k-omega turbulence model. and you did not mention your Reynolds number. if the case if for supersonic or hypersonic, change the solver to coupled. else, continue with segregated.

and yea, as its an external aerodynamics problem, you should keep y+ ( al wall y+ treatment) . y+ maybe more than 30 as well for external aerodynamics. depends on your flow.

if your Reynolds number is high, change to coupled solver from segregated, density based from pressure based.!!

I hope this reply helped you .!
sampathevs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2013, 02:35
Default
  #5
Member
 
EMAVI V SURYA SAMPATH
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 5
sampathevs is on a distinguished road
and dont worry with the residual plot. try checking the parameters which you are looking for.

example: if your are solving to determine the pressure drop, then wait until the net pressure becomes constant. residuals alone cannot decide your convergence.
sampathevs is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2013, 08:13
Default
  #6
New Member
 
MMatt
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 4
MMatt is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your answer!

I have specified the Reynolds number in my previous message (1.3E7). What would be the benefit to change from segregated flow to coupled flow (always thought for external vehicle aero it should be segregated).

Also you are talking about density and pressure based. I am using a constant density physic model, is that what are you talking about? Sorry for my ignorance.

Cheers for your help!

MMatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Y plus for various turbulence models taram CFX 8 December 16, 2013 12:44
Zero Equation Turbulence models stefan.gracik OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 April 17, 2013 14:12
KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 August 4, 2010 10:26
different zones, different turbulence models gmwsy FLUENT 3 June 19, 2009 06:08
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51.