CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

Anyone have infomration on Star-CCM+ using Xeon PHI co-processor?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By TMG

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 15, 2013, 10:34
Default Anyone have infomration on Star-CCM+ using Xeon PHI co-processor?
  #1
New Member
 
Joshua Brickel
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3
JoshuaB is on a distinguished road
Hi Folks,

I was wondering if anyone has any experience/information about Star-CCM+ using a Xeon-PHI co-processor. I am in the midst of specifying a new computer and I saw this is now available. I have seen literature that indicates the present versions of Star-CCM+ do not see that great an increase with using a CUDA based GPU co-processor, but I was wondering if the results are any different with a XEON-PHI co-processor.

They (INTEL) advertises that one does not need to you recompile software to use it. But on the other hand the amount of RAM that comes with it seems limited and thus it might not be that much of a help when doing CFD types of problems (it might be constantly transferring information to and from its on-board memory to the computers main memory).

Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Joshua
JoshuaB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2013, 12:42
Default
  #2
TMG
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 7
TMG is on a distinguished road
Both the Nivida GPU and the Intel PHI are different versions of the same animal. PHI is a little more flexible and easier to program but ultimately you still have to program for it.

STAR-CCM+ does not support either processor today because neither of them offer any benefits for the type of computing it does.
JoshuaB likes this.
TMG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2013, 10:19
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Joshua Brickel
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3
JoshuaB is on a distinguished road
TMG, thanks for the reply, you helped to clear that issue up for me.
JoshuaB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2014, 13:40
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Robert
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 6
lordvon is on a distinguished road
I do not think GPU and Xeon Phi are 'different versions of same animal'.

To use Xeon Phi, you only need to change some compiler flags, while for GPU you must completely rewrite the code.

Case in point, the guy in the following post used Xeon Phi for OpenFOAM by just recompilation (Of course optimization could be done by rewriting appropriate parts of code). Check it out:
OpenFOAM build on Intel Xeon Phi
lordvon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam parallel AndrewMortimer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 November 12, 2013 18:03
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 10:01
StarToFoam error Kart OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 4, 2010 05:38
Unaligned accesses on IA64 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 11:37
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 05:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:37.