CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

How to apply motion to overset region

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 13, 2013, 14:15
Default How to apply motion to overset region
  #1
Member
 
Henry Arrigo
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 6
Henry Arrigo is on a distinguished road
Hello
How is it possible to apply a prescribed unsteady movement to an overset region in STAR-CCM+?

(and by unsteady movement I mean translational motion which has the dimension of m not m/s, cm/s, mm/s and so forth)
Henry Arrigo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2013, 13:24
Default
  #2
Member
 
Henry Arrigo
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 6
Henry Arrigo is on a distinguished road
anybody has any idea?

Last edited by Henry Arrigo; December 21, 2013 at 12:51.
Henry Arrigo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2014, 02:23
Default
  #3
Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: India
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 3
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hello Henry

It is possible to apply a user defined motion, either by activating the DFBI Translation, Rotation in the 'Tools' folder or by defining your own field function.

Click the link below

http://postimg.org/image/xx3rduv83/
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2014, 11:18
Default
  #4
Member
 
Henry Arrigo
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 6
Henry Arrigo is on a distinguished road
Thank you Gulgulia
Translation, rotation tools need rotational/translational velocities to be specified, not the displacement. I am looking for something whereby I would be able to apply rotational/translational displacement to the rigid body.
Henry Arrigo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2014, 15:53
Default
  #5
New Member
 
DSK
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 2
dsk2 is on a distinguished road
Henry,

Its convenient to be able to specify displacement as opposed to velocities in Tools->Motion, but unfortunately I haven't found a way to do that either. So, what I do is calculate the velocities that give the displacement I desire and use the corresponding velocitiy expressions. Thus I end up with having to to significant math beforehand depending on how complex the trajectory of the moving body is.
dsk2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 22, 2014, 10:21
Default Translating Motion
  #6
New Member
 
Tasha
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Tasha4620 is on a distinguished road
I am a final year engineering student attempting to get a simple bluff body shape to translate vertically to simulate it going over a bump in a track.

I have been reading the previous posts and on the star CCM+ software that I am using under the field functions- motions option the construction tree just says stationary and there is no option of changing it.

Can you suggest the reason or as anyone got any more information about how I could impose motion on my model.

Thanks alot

Tasha
Tasha4620 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2014, 06:49
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 223
Rep Power: 8
ping is on a distinguished road
Tasha4620 - this is quite simple to do - create your field function of velocity in that direction eg Yvel. then create a motion type translation. click on the .... in the translation velocity and type the field function name in the required component eg $Yvel. then set time to unsteady and apply that motion to the region.
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2014, 01:59
Default
  #8
Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: India
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 3
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hey Tasha

Maybe you have not yet activated the Implicit Unsteady model that's why it's showing only Stationary Model. Please check your physics model.
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2014, 02:07
Default
  #9
Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: India
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 3
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hello Henry

Sorry for the delay in reply.

You can define the motion velocity.For this you have to

1. activate the Overset motion by creating appropriate mesh and interfaces.

2. Next as I mentioned you have to select DFBI body in the motion tools.

3. Expand the Region containing the rigid body which will move, go to Boundary Condition--> Motion . In the Properties Window change it to DFBI.

4. The above step will add a DFBI Node in the design tree. There you can specify the inertia properties of the body, velocity, and release time.

I suggest define an appropriate release time so that the flow fields develop sufficiently before the DFBI is activated.
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2014, 23:07
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 8
Josh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsk2 View Post
Henry,

Its convenient to be able to specify displacement as opposed to velocities in Tools->Motion, but unfortunately I haven't found a way to do that either. So, what I do is calculate the velocities that give the displacement I desire and use the corresponding velocitiy expressions. Thus I end up with having to to significant math beforehand depending on how complex the trajectory of the moving body is.
Hi folks, especially DSK,

I am having a similar issue. I have a cylinder rolling sinusoidally at the surface. The displacement equation is:

[roll motion with respect to time] = [rolling amplitude] * sin([angular frequency]*[time])

However, the Rotation Motion in CCM+ requires a rotation rate [rad/s] rather than displacement value. So, does this "significant math" you speak of entail rearranging the above equation and solving for angular frequency? Surely, there's an easier to achieve forced sinusoidal rolling motion in CCM+.

Thanks!
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2014, 04:17
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 223
Rep Power: 8
ping is on a distinguished road
for sinusoidal motion you can easily differentiate the equation of displacement you want to get the velocity equation

you could also do this within field functions or out in excel etc and import as a table

the reason most motion is input as velocity is that it then becomes indepedant of your timestep - otherwise each time you change timestep you need to change displacement
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2014, 20:09
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 8
Josh is on a distinguished road
Hi ping,

[time] is the real time, not the timestep, so it should be independent of timestep, correct?

Regardless, I derived the equation and input that as the motion. Now I want to verify the rolling angle is correct in STAR-CCM+. I have created a probe point on the corner of the object and compared the maximum Y value with the initial Y value, then pulled a little Pythagorean theorem to find the roll amplitude angle. Is there an easier way to go about this so I can verify each simulation has the correct roll amplitude?
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2014, 04:32
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 223
Rep Power: 8
ping is on a distinguished road
when doing forced motion you normally want to achieve the same displacement at a certain instance in time independant of what you set the timestep to, and a velocity input achieves this

a probe its move with the motion property enable is the best way i have found to do this
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multiple regions Tobi OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 47 September 9, 2014 09:36
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 06:21
Overset mesh error Caterpillar85 STAR-CCM+ 2 February 12, 2013 05:54
how to apply rotational and translational motion together in a vane pump rohin eapen STAR-CCM+ 2 January 22, 2013 13:48
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:29.